Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1965 (12) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der section 66A(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, hereinafter referred to as the Act, read with section 261 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, are directed against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in a consolidated reference made to it by the Appellate Tribunal. These appeals relate to the assessment years 1945-46 and 1946-47. The question referred at the instance of the appellant wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd 25% for the selling process." Mr. Viswanatha Sastri, the learned counsel for the appellant, contended that on the facts of this case the assessee was liable to tax not on accrual basis but on receipt basis. When asked how does the revenue suffer by the amounts involved in these assessment years being taxed on accrual basis rather than on receipt basis, the learned counsel frankly and properly....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s to the amount of profits which arose on the amounts received by the assessee's bankers. The appellate order of the Appellate Tribunal does not contain any discussion on the point as to the correct manner of apportioning profits between the manufacturing process and the selling process. Apparently, the High Court felt that as they had substituted the accrual basis for the receipt basis, they also....