Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (8) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6-5-1991 have inter alia stated that there was no cause for review as no adjudication on facts had taken place; that the order of the Assistant Collector was arbitrary and against principles of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was given; that affixing of label (supplied free of charge by buyer abroad) was not an activity connected with the manufacture and hence out of the purview of Rule 3(1) of the Customs and Central Excise Duty Drawback Rules, 1971; that the Appellate Authority had rightly remanded the case to the original authority for determining whether FOB value of the goods, included the value of the label or hot. According to the respondent this was essential as drawback was claimed on FOB value and they had n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the extant Drawback Schedule. In the shipping bills they had given declaration to the effect that the imported labels which were earlier cleared duty free under Customs Notification No. 150/80 were affixed on the goods exported. The original authority while sanctioning drawback deducted from the drawback so sanctioned the duty which was foregone on the imported labels which were fixed on the exported goods as per the provisions of sub-rule 1 of Rule 3 ibid. The Appellate Authority while upholding the original authority's finding that fixing of label was manufacturing activity and duty so foregone on the labels was rightly deductible under Rule 3(1) ibid, however, remanded the case to the original authority for verifying whether the value ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der any of the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and the rules made thereunder, or of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) and the rules made thereunder, the drawback admissible on the said goods shall be reduced taking into account the lesser duty paid or the rebate, refund or credit obtained. Provided further that no drawback shall be allowed. (i) .......... (ii) If the said goods are produced or manufactured using imported materials or excisable materials in respect of which duties have not been paid; Or (iii) ......... Notification No. 150/80 "In exercise of the power.....Central Government.......... hereby exempt tag or lables (whether made of paper, cloth or plastic)........ when importe....