Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (7) TMI 1483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he I.T. Act, 1961. 2. That the worthy CIT(A)-2, Ludhiana has not appreciated the facts that inspite of providing various opportunities, the assessee was not able to provide confirmation of creditors amounting to Rs. 2,04,38,739/- 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed its return of income declaring income of Rs. 2,01,11,910/- on 03/09/2013. The assessee is engaged in trading of vehicles and spare part, running of vehicle workshop, insurance commission, DMA commission from banks and finance companies under proprietor concern M/s Dada Motors. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the assessee had shown Current Liabilities & Provisions under Schedule-10 at Rs. 67.90 Crores. Duri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned back in the subsequent years. However the assessee could not submitted the confirmation pertaining to 13644 creditors amounting to Rs. 20438739/-. The AO has brought this amount to tax under section 68 being the sundry creditor for which no confirmation have been filed with the assessee. 5. Before the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee has made following submissions: (4) That no addition has never been made u/s 68 of the income tax act on the issue of sundry creditors in any of the earlier and succeeding years except the year under appeal. (5) That the onus of proving identity of the creditors, genuiness of transactions and mentioning of PAN wherever required under law duly discharged by the appellant by providing postal addre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... duly settled in the succeeding years. 6. Before us the Ld. DR contended that inspite of many opportunities the assessee has not filed confirmation letters thus failed to discharge the primary onus regarding genuineness of the sundry creditor and hence the addition was warranted. 7. We have gone through the documents filed before us and also submissions made before the lower authorities. The amount brought to tax under section 68 pertains to outstanding balance of 13644 parties and the amount ranging from Rs. 28. The assessee has also produced documents as to how the credit balance were adjusted / squared off in the subsequent years. It is also pertinent to note that the sundry creditor pertains to AY 2011-12 and 2012-13 too. 8. Th....