TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1996 (9) TMI 157
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed under Rule 57G follows the determination of eligibility of credit as set out under Rules 57A, 57C and 57E . As such the criterion of allowing credit (by way of adjustment) as per Rule 57E takes precedence over the process under Rule 57G. Whether in this above regard, the Honourable Tribunal was correct in law in holding that Rule 57E is merely clarificatory in nature to Rule 57G ? Honourable Tribunal have held that Notification No.117/87,(ii) dated 15-4-1987 as well as other Notifications issued under Rule 57E are clarificatory in nature and hence would have retrospective effect. On the one hand, it is held that the condition of six months limit vide Notification No. 28/95, dated 29-6-1995 for taking credit did not exist at that time (1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Leyland Limited, Madras, engaged in the manufacture of heavy vehicles, has been availing Modvat credit on inputs under the Rules in Section AA of Chapter 5 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short, the Rules). Respondent was entitled to do so since the input received and the final product manufactured were specified under Rule 57A of the Rules. Modvat credit had been availed of and central excise duty paid on certain specified inputs. Subsequent to the receipt of such duty paid inputs, the manufacturer of the inputs was required to pay differential duty on the inputs and the same was paid on various date during the period from 21-4-1986 to 2-4-1987. Certificates evidencing payment of differential duty were furnished to respondent during....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....led Appeal No. E/607/89-MAS (NB) in the Tribunal challenging the order of the Collector (Appeals). In view of conflicting views taken by different Benches of the Tribunal on the question involved, certain other appeals giving rise to the same question were referred to Larger Bench. The appeal filed by the present Respondent was also so referred. The duty constituted Larger Bench heard all the appeals and disposed of the same by the common order No. A/1479-1486/96-NB, dated 31-5-1996 reported in 1996 (15) RLT 44 (CEGAT-NB) rejecting the contentions of the Revenue and upholding the contentions of the assessees. This order has given rise to the present application. 4.Section AA of Chapter 5 of the Rules contain the scheme of Modvat credit. On....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n payment of refund to manufacturers of inputs and did not contain a provision for variation of credit consequent on variation of duty and resulting in recovery of more duty from manufacturers of inputs and such a provision was for the first time incorporated in Rule 57E with effect from 1-3-1987 but this provision was applicable only if the variation of duty was due to change in classification of inputs on the basis of instructions issued by the board and was not applicable to variation of duty in the present case. A provision covering the situation obtaining in the present case was incorporated only by the amendment incorporated with effect from 15-4-1987. (h) The right of manufacturers of final products to take credit after obtaining ac....