Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Why we should continue Section 107 of the CGST Act 2017 anymore ?

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hy we should continue Section 107 of the CGST Act 2017 anymore ?<br>By: - K Balasubramanian<br>Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Dated:- 13-12-2025<br>This question may look odd but in my professional capacity I came across more than 100 cases where the adjudication order is confirmed by the first appellate authority due to silly reasons despite the case having strong merits in appeal. By merely re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....jecting the appeal even in meritorious cases, the first appellate authority is proving the entire world that his quasi judicial role is not properly understood by him as well as his lack of understanding the case in an appropriate manner spoils his name. If at all in almost all cases the first appellate authority is going to reject the appeal under flimsy grounds, then why should not we delete se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction 107 and make a provision that the appeal against all adjudication orders shall lie before the GSTAT?. One such case which moots this question came up before the Allahabad high Court on 11/11/2025 in M/s R.A.A. Builders And Developers Versus Commissioner Of Commercial Tax And 2 Others -&nbsp;2025 (11) TMI 1529 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT. &nbsp;The chronology of the events are described below. F....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the period from April 2018 to March 2019, a show cause notice under section 73 was issued on 31/01/2024 raising a total demand of Rs 45,66,398/= based on differences in GST Returns. The taxpayer replied and without considering such replies, adjudication order was passed on 30/04/2024 imposing a total demand amount of Rs 68,07,953/= in clear violation of Section 75 (7) which reads as "the amount....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on the grounds other than the grounds specified in the notice". Thus by confirming a demand of 68 lakhs as against permissible amount of &nbsp;46 &nbsp;lakhs, the adjudicating authority have no shame in declaring the world that he is not even aware of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he provisions contained in section 75, which is on determination of tax. The taxpayer preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority which was rejected on 13/02/2025. The Appellate Authority, who is higher in rank than the adjudicating authority is eagerly willing to declare that he is no more different in awareness of section 75 and not even bothered to note that his order is liable to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be set aside by the jurisdictional high court at a later date. The operative portions are reproduced to create awareness amongst all tax professionals to verify the adjudication orders to ensure that the final demand raised does not exceed amount specified in SCN even in a single case. In case such cases are identified now, we may still go for appeal with First appellate authority or GSTAT as th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e case may be to ensure proper justice to the taxpayer. In case the first appeal is rejected on limitation, that strengthens the case to become fit for appeal in GSTAT. 8. Identical issue has been decided by the Division Bench of this Court in Unique Computer & Communication Shop (supra); wherein, it has been held as under:- "7. Provisions of Section 75(7), inter alia, read as under: "(7) The a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on the grounds other than the grounds specified in the notice." 8. A perusal of the above would reveal that Section 75 deals with general provisions relating to determination of tax and sub-section (7) specifically stipulates that the amount of tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be on the grounds other than the grounds specified in the notice. 9. Admittedly, in the present case, the show-cause notice merely indicates the amount of Rs. 45,66,398/- as representing the tax, interest and penalty and the demand qua the three components has been raised ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at Rs. 68,07,953/-, which is ex facie contrary to the provisions of Section 75(7) of the Act. 10. So far as the plea pertaining to not providing any opportunity of personal hearing is concerned, once it is the case of the petitioner that it was unaware of the issuance of the show-cause notice, the fact that in the notice issued to the petitioner, the date of filing of reply was indicated, looses ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....its significance and it cannot be said that on account of such indication, the notice, on its own, would stand vitiated. 11. In view of the above discussion, on account of violation of provisions of Section 75(7) of the Act, the order impugned cannot be sustained. " 9. The issue in hand is squarely covered by the above-noted judgement as relied upon by the petitioner. 10. In view of the aforesa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id facts & circumstances of the case, the impugned orders cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. The same are hereby quashed. 11. The writ petition succeeds and is allowed. 12. The matter is remanded back to the respondent no. 2 to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to file response to the show cause notice and after providing opportunity of hearing, pass a fresh order in accordance with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....law.<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....