Home /
2009 (7) TMI 166
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the revenue under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging order dated 8-5-2008 passed by the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for brevity, 'the Tribunal') holding that the dealer-respondent could not be saddled with penalty under Section 11AC of the Act because there was no material substantiating clandestine removal of the goods. On that premise th....