2025 (12) TMI 601

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5. The impugned orders were emanated from the orders of the Ld. Income-tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Mumbai (in short, 'Ld AO'), order passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act, date of orders 30/03/2018. 2. All the appeals have same nature of facts and a common issue. Therefore, all the appeals were taken together, heard together and are disposed of by this common order. ITA No. 5734/Mum/2025 is taken as lead case. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), engaged in the business of manufacture and trader of HDPE pipes. The assessments were framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147, date of order 29/03/2024. In the assessment order, the Ld.AO observed that the assessee had purchases amount to Rs. 68,08,698/- which ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of facts. This is evident from the fact that the AO made addition of Rs. 68,08,698/- i.e 100% of alleged bogus purchases, which was restricted by CIT(A) to Rs. 8,51,087/- i.e. 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases. On farther appeal to ITAT the Hon'ble ITAT estimated the disallowance to Rs. 6,80,365/- i.e 10% of alleged bogus purchases. Thus it is submitted that the CIT(A) and the Hon'ble ITAT has accepted the fact that purchases are genuine purchases but confirmed the part addition on estimate basis as the concerned parties were not available for verification of the purchase price. Thus, it is respectfully submitted that the additions/disallowances made are only an estimated disallowance without any cogent basis. The Appellant submit t....