2008 (9) TMI 393

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....- CM No. 2082-CII of 2008 : For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 1281 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM. stands disposed of. CEA No. 13 of 2007 : The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order dated 17-4-2002 [2002 (147) E.L.T. 798 (Tri. - Del.).] dismi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o Show Cause Notice was issued by the Commissioner? (iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned Commissioner was right in confirming the order of the Commissioner when in various judgments the Tribunal has held that abatement claim under Rule 6 ZO(2) shall be available from the date of filing of the intimation of closure, even in cases where the intimation is filed late....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ch order, subject to the fulfilment of the prescribed conditions. The conditions relevant to the present case are extracted below :- "(a) the manufacturer shall inform in writing about the closure to the Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise, with a copy to the Superintendent of Central Excise, either prior to the date of closure or on the date of closure. (b) the manufacturer, when he starts....