2025 (12) TMI 434
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ty: Mr. Uday Sankar Bhattacharya, Mr. Tapan Bhanja. For the Respondent No. 8: Mr. Sujit Bhunia. For the State: Mr. S.K. Dutta, Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty, Ms. Sumita Shaw, Mr. Saptak Sanyal. ORDER 1. The petitioners assail an adjudication order dated February 5, 2025 passed under Section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. 2. Mr. Kanodia, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....otice appears to be non-furnishing of certain documents that has been sought for by the Central GST Authorities by way of various letters, but the show-cause notice is silent on the aspect as to exactly what document was required to be submitted by the petitioners, if the petitioners had already submitted the requisite documents in answer to the notices issued by the Central GST Authorities. 5.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of 2017, this Court should intervene. In support of such submission he relies on the following authorities: a. Eden Real Estates Private Limited & Anr. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bhabanipur Charge & Ors. (WPA 19145 of 2024, passed on September 3, 2024); b. Bhagya Kalita vs. Union of India, reported in (2025) 26 Centax 35 (Gau.); c. Kunjal Synergies Pri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the said officer from either communicating nor be uploading the final order on the portal without the leave of the Court. It is further submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, a final reminder for payment of the outstanding demand has been raised by the respondent authorities. 9. Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and having considered the mate....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI