Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Penalty under Section 112 set aside as non-notified goods; department failed burden under Section 123 Customs Act

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The seized leather jackets and readymade garments, though recovered from bags in a parcel van leased to the appellant, are not notified goods under Section 123. Consequently, the burden lay on the Department to prove that the goods were smuggled and cleared without payment of customs duty. As no corroborative evidence was produced to establish smuggled nature or the appellant's involvement beyond mere transportation, the penal liability was held unsustainable.....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Penalty under Section 112 set aside as non-notified goods; department failed burden under Section 123 Customs Act