CESTAT quashes excise duty demands on tile makers for lack of evidence and non-compliance with Section 9D
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CESTAT allowed the appeals filed by various anonymous tile manufacturers and associated noticees, setting aside the entire demand of central excise duty, interest and penalties arising from alleged clandestine manufacture and removal of ceramic/vitrified tiles and sanitaryware. The Tribunal held that the Dept. failed to discharge its burden of proof, as the case rested almost entirely on uncorroborated third-party statements, scribbled bank entries and assumptions, without seizure of offending goods, excess stock, corroborative transport documents, or evidence of excess raw material, power consumption or labour. CESTAT also noted non-compliance with s. 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, since key statements were neither properly examined i.........
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI