2007 (11) TMI 309

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l considering the facts on record held that the Appellant was a conspirator and considering the provisions of sub-section (a) or (b) of Section 112 was liable for penalty and accordingly upheld the order of penalty which was imposed. The Appellant aggrieved preferred rectification application before the Tribunal which came to be disposed of by order dated 15th April, 2005. The learned Bench of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Court dated 15th December, 2005 was a typing error as no review is maintainable under the Act and what is maintainable is rectification application. That application was heard and the learned Tribunal by its order dated 22nd December, 2006 held that the same points which were raised in the first rectification application were also raised in the second application and consequently dismissed the sam....