Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (11) TMI 1295

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1.1 The ex-parte order passed u/s.250 on 13.06.2025 for A.Y.2015-16 by NFAC.CIT(A), Delhi (for short CIT(A)], upholding the addition of Rs. 5,44,75,025/- received from Shiv Shakti Industries as unexplained cash credits u/s.68 of IT Act is wholly illegal, unlawful and against the principles of natural justice. 1.2 The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in disposing of the appeal ex-parte on the ground of non-response to the notice of hearing, though there was sufficient cause for non-compliance to the said notices of hearing issued in appellate proceedings. 1.3 The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have allowed sufficient opportunity of hearing as well as passed a speaking and reasoned order after considering the material produced before AO. Thus,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....O and confirmed by CIT(A) to hold the said sum of Rs. 5,44,75,025/- received from M/s Shivshakti Corporation as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 are not admitted by the appellant in so far as the same are against him. 2.4 Without prejudice to above and in the alternative the Id. CIT(A) ought not to have held the entire amount of Rs. 5,44,75,025/- which showed in balance sheet of M/s Shiv Shakti Industries as taxable income instead of restricting to the net profit there from after considering the computation of income furnished. Thus, the impugned addition is highly excessive and calls for Null. It is therefore prayed that the addition of Rs. 5,44,75,025/- confirmed by the AO should be deleted or in the alternative reduced. ....