Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 1550

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....epartment adopted the NIDB data to enhance the valus and revised the Customs Duty to be paid. 3. Being aggrieved, the Appellant-Revenue has filed an Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The ld.Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the enhancement of value. Against the said order, the Revenue is in appeal. 4. Heard both the parties and considered the submissions. 5. We find that the similar issue has been dealt by this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata Vs. M/s Bajaj Writing Aid vide Final Order No.77599/2023 dated 31.10.2023 wherein this Tribunal has held as under : "2. Being aggrieved the Appellant had filed an Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) has gone throu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the present case which is not the right way to adjudication. The Principal Bench of CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of M/s Margra Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nodia reported in 2007 (216) ELT 710 (Tri Del) has held as, "..................... 10. It is well recognized that quality and price of marble vary vastly depending upon place of occurrence. The Revenue authorities have made comparison of value without taking these aspects into account. The imports were of 'Monaco Brown', 'Diano', 'Mermer Royal Beize' etc. The prices are also varying vastly. In fact, the price of 'Monaco' imported by the appellant under Bill of Entry No. 277105 was higher than the contemporaneous import of the same item at Euro 315. The Rev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for sale. Therefore, in these circumstances, the enhancement of assessable value is liable to be struck down and set aside and the bills of entry in the impugned appeal are to be assessed at value declared by the appellant. 23. Therefore, I have no hesitation to hold that the enhancement of values done in this case is without having any sanction of law and is thus liable to be set aside outrightly. [Emphasis Supplied] 24. In view of above, the enhancement of values in the present case is not sustainable in the eye of law and accordingly assessment of the impugned bills of entry is ordered at the values declared at invoice value. The appeal is accordingly liable to be allowed with consequential relief." 3....