Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (3) TMI 272

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to raise the following four questions of law : A.  "Whether the 'Conversion' of Shipping Bill from one scheme to another is a change substantive in nature and different than the 'Amendment' of document as envisaged u/s. 149 of Customs Act, 1962?" B.  "Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT was justified in holding that 'Amendment' of document as u/s. 149 of Customs Act, 1962 and Conversion of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eeking a benefit under DEPB Scheme. Later on after realising the mistake, the Respondent sought conversion of the same into DEEC Scheme. We have perused the Order-in-Original, wherein the Commissioner of Customs (Export) has categorically given a finding as under :- "Here, I find that the exporters M/s. Man Industries (I) Ltd., were entitled to avail the benefits of DEEC Scheme but they suo mot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e time of export of the goods, as is the requirement in the proviso to Section 149. 2.3. Since the entire claim of the Appellant is established on the basis of documentary evidence already in existence at the time of export, there was no valid reason for the Commissioner to have refused such an amendment. The impugned order passed is therefore clearly untenable and is to be set aside." 4.Fro....