2007 (5) TMI 246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ur show cause notices covered the period August 1996 to May 1998. 3. M/s. J.K. Tyre and Industries Ltd. (assessee) are engaged in the manufacture of vehicle tyres as also calendered fabric by using dipped rubberised tyre cord fabric of high tenacity yarn of nylon. Since the product was used captively it was exempted from payment of excise duty under Notification No. 67/95 dated 16-3-1995. However, additional duty of excise was leviable on dipped rubberised tyre cord fabric, according to the Department, under additional duties of Excise Act 1957. Therefore, show cause notices were issued on the assessee (respondent No. 1 herein) in which it was alleged by the Department that "dipped rubberised tyre cord fabric manufactured and used captiv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is not necessary to go into further facts of the present case, since we are of the view that in the present matter the adjudication took place at the time when there were two judgment of the Tribunal in Falcon Tyres Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, 1996 (88) E.L.T. 450 and Vikrant Tyres Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, 1997 (90) E.L.T. 178. The aforesaid two judgments of the Tribunal have been discussed in the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa and Chennai v. MRF Ltd. reported in 2005 (180) E.L.T. 145 (S.C.) in which this Court has drawn a distinction between rubberised tyre cord fabric classifiably under Chapter Heading 59.05 and dipped tyre cord fabric classifiable unde....