2025 (8) TMI 1729
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....us nature. I. Whether a Society can be construed to be a 'trust or a 'constructive trust'? a. Circumstances under which the creation of a trust has been inferred b. Views of different High Courts on the issue c. Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the 'vesting' of properties in the Executive Committee. d. The doctrine of constructive trust and its applicability to a society functioning for public purposes of a religious or charitable nature B. A breach of trust or the directions of the court being necessary for the administration of the trust. C. The institution of the suit must be made by two or more persons "having an interest in the trust" D. The reliefs falling within the scope of those enumerated under Section 92(1) of the CPC along with the object, purpose and capacity in which the suit is brought. F. CONCLUSION 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 21.08.2024 in FAO(OS) No. 114 of 2024 (hereinafter, the "impugned decision"), by which the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appella....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sh, maintain, run and encourage alternative systems of medicine and establish training and research centers for this purpose as Govt, rule. 4.1.6 To aid, promote, establish, maintain, run and encourage microcredit/microfinance as per Govt. rule. 4.1.7 To open centers and institutes for diagnostic, curative, therapeutic and research of medical sciences as per Govt. rule, 4.1.8 To provide free medicines to the poor." 4. The MoA of the appellant Society also stipulates that all the incomes and earnings of the society, whether movable or immovable, shall solely be utilised to further the aims and objectives of the appellant Society. Furthermore, it is also stated that the members of the appellant society would not be entitled to any profits by virtue of their membership. The relevant portion of the MoA is extracted hereinbelow: "All the incomes, earnings, movable or immovable properties of the society shall be solely utilized and applied towards the promotion of its aims and objectives only as set forth in the memorandum of association and no profits thereof shall be paid or transferred directly or indirectly by way of dividends, bonus, profits or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... receive monies, securities, instruments, investments, or any other assets for and on behalf of the Society. 11.2.3.7 To enter into agreements contracts for and on behalf of the Society. 11.2.3.8 To manage, serve, transfer or otherwise dispose-off any property, movable or immovable of the Society. 11.2.3.9 To prescribe the powers, duties and functions of the office-bearers. 11.2.3.10 To exercise control over the President and the General secretary of the Society including the powers of dismissal. 11.2.3.11 To appoint the Secretary of the Society. 11.2.3.12 To elect new members to the Committee when casual vacancies occur. 11.2.3.13 To appoint the Secretary of the society. -xxx- 13. SOURCES OF INCOME & UTILIAZATION OF FUNDS Funds will be raised by way of grants-in-aid, donations, gifts, subscriptions fees, and income from investments, loans and other means available to the Society under the Act. Funds will be used to carry out the Aims and Objectives of the Society." 6. Dr. Shelly Batra (hereinafter, the "respondent no. 1/original plaintiff no. 1") is a medical health professional and co-fou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns. Furthermore, that the funds received by the society have been utilised for activities outside India, which is impermissible, since the requisite permission was not taken from the appropriate governmental authorities and yet, tax benefits were illegally availed for the same. ii. That there has been a severe mismanagement in the administration of the appellant Society by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively. They have avoided making accounting provisions for statutory disbursements in the form of provident fund or gratuity to their employees and are also engaging in cross- payment of salaries to employees through their sister concerns with a view to avoid the grant of statutorily mandated employee benefits. iii. That the respondent no. 3 has misrepresented information and thereby misled the donors of the appellant Society with an intent to defraud them by claiming that the appellant society had provided COVID-19 related services to more than 12,600 families and 10,000 migrants, however, the same remains entirely uncorroborated and unsubstantiated. iv. That the respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively, used force and coerced several employees in order to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r rendition of accounts of profits/monies siphoned, misappropriated, illegally earned by Defendant Nos.2- 3 for their personal use/benefit from the accounts/funds of Defendant No.1, and further a decree for recovery of the amount be found to be due, siphoned, misappropriated, etc. by the Defendant Nos. 2-3 along with interest @18% in favour of Defendant No. 1; and/or I Pass a decree or order regarding settling the scheme of the Defendant No. 1 by amending its bye-laws in such manner that no one family gets complete control of the affairs of Defendant No. 1: (f) Costs: (g) Any other relief (s) which this Hon'ble Court deems, fit, just and proper may also be awarded in favour of the Plaintiffs, in the interest of justice." 10. In pursuance of the aforesaid, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively, filed an application being I.A. No. 5009 of 2020 in CS (OS) No. 153 of 2020 seeking leave to institute the civil suit against the appellant Society along with the respondent nos. 3 to 10 (collectively referred to as the "original defendants") before the learned Single Judge of the High Court. In the said application, it was stated that the appellant Societ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t may be necessary. ii. Secondly, heavy reliance was placed on the decision of this Court in Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr vs. Sitalaxmi Sahuwala Medical Trust & Ors. reported in (2020) 4 SCC 321 to grant leave under Section 92 of the CPC since the enunciation of law in the said decision is also said to have been made in a strikingly similar factual background. It was reiterated that it is the dominant purpose of the suit, as discernible strictly from the allegations made in the plaint that is required to be assessed by the court while considering whether leave must be granted to institute the suit or not. iii. Thirdly, that the respondent no. 1 (original plaintiff no. 1) being one of the co- founders of the appellant Society and a long-time President of its Board, along with the respondent no. 2 (original plaintiff no. 2) who has been associated with the appellant Society for an extended period of time while also continuing to be a member of its Board, would constitute 'persons having an interest in the trust'. iv. Fourthly, while referring to Article 13 of the AoA as per which the society is entitled to raise funds by way of gifts, donations, grants-i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....int: 22.1. Plaintiff No.1 is one of the co-founders of defendant No. 1 society and has been a long time President of its Board, Plaintiff No.2. has been associated with defendant No.1 society for a long time and continues to be a member of the Board of the society, even if she is plaintiff No.1's mother. In fact these assertions appear to reflect the admitted position. 22.2. Plaintiff No.1 has played a pivotal role in the functioning of the society ever since it was established. -xxx- "22.4. Furthermore, a perusal of the Articles of Association ('AOA') of defendant No.1 society inter-alia shows that the management of the society is entrusted to an Executive Committee, which is entitled to raise funds for the society by way of gifts, donations, grants-in-aid or otherwise, which funds are to be used to carry-out the aims and objectives of the society. Attention in this behalf may be drawn to Article 13 of the AoA of the society, which reads as follows [ ... ] In the opinion of this court, the formal 'entrustment' of property or funds by a third-party to defendant No.1 society is not a necessary ingredient to hold that the soc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dingly allowed." (Emphasis supplied) B. THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 14. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 03.05.2024, the appellant Society preferred an appeal being FAO (OS) No. 114 of 2024 before the Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench while dismissing the appeal, observed as follows: i. First, reliance was, again, placed on the decision of this Court in Ashok Kumar Gupta (supra) in order to delineate the conditions that are required to be satisfied under Section 92 of the CPC. ii. Secondly, the Division Bench echoed the observations made by the Single Judge in as much as observing that the appellant Society is admittedly of a charitable nature as evident from its MoA. iii. Thirdly, reliance was placed on the relevant provisions of the MoA which stipulated that all the incomes, earnings, movable or immovable properties of the society shall be solely applied towards furthering the objectives of the society and no profits shall be paid, either directly or indirectly, to the members of the Board or any person claiming through or under them. Furthermore, while referring to Article 11.2.1 of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 11.2.1 of the Articles of Association specifically stipulates that all the properties, movable, immovable and other kinds of assets shall stand vested in the Committee. 15. Keeping in view the aforesaid as well as the fact that the Appellant has been set-up with the primary objective of providing medical relief to patients, who otherwise cannot afford such treatment, this Court is in agreement with the view of the learned Single Judge that all the donations, gifts etc. made to the Appellant-society are property entrusted to it, by reason of which the society acquires the character of a 'constructive trust'. 16. In the above context, it would also be necessary to refer to the judgment of Supreme Court in Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee vs. Som Nath Dass 2000 (4) SCC 146, wherein it has been held that an "endowment" is, when the donor parts with his property for it to be used for a public purpose and its entrustment is to a person or group of persons for carrying out the objective of such entrustment. It was held that once an endowment is made, it is final and irrevocable and it is onerous duty of the persons entrusted with such endowment to carry ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ific reference was made to Clauses 11.2.1 and 11.2.3.8 of the AoA respectively to contend that the property of the society stands vested in the 'Committee' or Governing Body of the Society, as per the mandate of Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. On this aspect, reliance was placed on the decision of the Madras High Court in K. Rajamanickam v. Periyar Self Respect Propaganda Institution, Thiruchirapalli reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Mad 379. 17. Taking recourse to the decision of this Court in Swami Paramatmanand Saraswati v. Ramji Tripathi reported in 1974 2 SCC 695, it was submitted that, while deciding an application under Section 92 of the CPC, the court must only look at the averments made in the plaint. The plaint, in the present case, is conspicuously silent on how the appellant Society falls within the definition of the term 'constructive trust'. Therefore, it was submitted that the underlying suit is clearly beyond the ambit of Section 92. 18. To further substantiate his submissions as regards the appellant Society not being a 'constructive trust', the counsel stated that "a constructive trust is another species of trust where a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....a decree for the purposes mentioned in the said provision, and (b) the suit should be on behalf of the Advocate General or two or more persons having an interest in the trust. He submitted that both the aforesaid conditions have not been fulfilled in the present case since the appellant Society is not a public trust and there is no pleading in the plaint showing that the respondent no. 2 (original plaintiff no. 2) is a party having an "interest" in the society. Moreover, the respondent no. 2 has not even signed the plaint in the instant suit. 22. In light of the aforesaid, it was submitted that the impugned decision is upheld, it would obliterate the distinction carved out by law between a 'trust' and a 'society' for which two different legislations have been enacted. Therefore, it was prayed that the impugned decision be set aside and the underlying suit, pending before the High Court, be dismissed. ii. Submissions on behalf of the respondent no. 1 23. On the other hand, Mr. Jai Anant Dehadrai, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 submitted that the ingredients required to be satisfied before invoking Section 92 of the CPC was clearly lai....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... It was submitted that the reliefs sought in the plaint are in complete consonance with Section 92(1) of the CPC and the impugned decision has specifically held that the reliefs sought by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively in their plaint, in particular, prayers (d) and (e) fall within the reliefs mentioned under Section 92(1). Hence, the plaint satisfies yet another ingredient required under Section 92 of the CPC. 28. In light of the aforesaid, it was submitted that the appellant Society though registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 yet must be construed as falling within the expression of a 'constructive trust' under Section 92 of the CPC as it holds property for charitable work. Therefore, the impugned decision granting leave to institute the suit, suffers from no infirmity and may not be interfered with. iii. Submissions on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4 29. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively, submitted that the application seeking leave to institute the present suit has been filed in complete disregard of the mandatory conditions stipulated under Section 92 of the CPC. Section 92 req....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....its of whose jurisdiction the whole or any part of the subject-matter of the trust is situate to obtain a decree- (a) removing any trustee; (b) appointing a new trustee; I vesting any property in a trustee; [(cc) directing a trustee who has been removed or a person who has ceased to be a trustee, to deliver possession of any trust property in his possession to the person entitled to the possession of such property;] (d) directing accounts and inquiries; I declaring what proportion of the trust property or of the interest therein shall be allocated to any particular object of the trust; (f) authorising the whole or any part of the trust property to be let, sold, mortgaged or exchanged; (g) settling a scheme; or (h) granting such further or other relief as the nature of the case may require. (2) Save as provided by the Religious Endowments Act, 1863 (20 of 1863), [or by any corresponding law in force in [the territories which, immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in Part B States]], no suit claiming any of the reliefs specified in sub-section (1) shall be instituted in respe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e CPC is a 'representative suit' while deciding whether the second suit would be barred by constructive res judicata. It was stated that when a suit is brought under Section 92, by two or more persons interested in the trust, they could be said to have taken upon themselves the responsibility of representing all the beneficiaries in the trust and though, all the said beneficiaries may not be expressly impleaded in the suit, the action is essentially instituted on their behalf and the relief claimed is representative in character. While stating so, however, it was clarified that the plaintiffs bringing the second suit must have the 'same interest' as that of the plaintiffs or defendants of the earlier representative suit, for the principle of res judicata to apply. In other words, it must be examined if the interest of the plaintiffs in the second suit was represented in the earlier representative suit. The relevant observations are thus: "16. In assessing the validity of this argument, it is necessary to consider the basis of the decisions that a decree passed in a suit under Section 92 binds all parties. The basis of this view is that a suit under Section ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the suit-title would be considered to be the parties to the suit. The named plaintiffs are only the representatives of the public at large who are interested in the suit and therefore, in the eyes of law, all such interested persons would be considered to be parties to the suit. The relevant observations are reproduced hereinbelow: "19. As observed by this Court in R. Venugopala Naidu v. Venkatarayulu Naidu Charities [1989 Supp (2) SCC 356 : AIR 1990 SC 444] a suit under Section 92 CPC is a suit of special nature for the protection of public rights in the public trust and charities. The suit is fundamentally on behalf of the entire body of persons who are interested in the trust. It is for the vindication of public rights. The beneficiaries of the trust, which may consist of the public at large, may choose two or more persons amongst themselves for the purpose of filing a suit under Section 92 CPC and the suit-title in that event would show only their names as plaintiffs. Can we say that the persons whose names are in the suit- title are the only parties to the suit? The answer would be in the negative. The named plaintiffs being the representatives of the public at large ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CPC is to protect the public trust of a charitable and religious nature from being subjected to harassment by suits filed against them. Public trusts for charitable and religious purpose are run for the benefit of the public. No individual should take benefit from them. If the persons in management of the trusts are subjected to multiplicity of legal proceedings, funds which are to be used for charitable or religious purposes would be wasted on litigation. The harassment might dissuade respectable and honest people from becoming trustees of pubic trusts. Thus, there is need for scrutiny. -xxx- 25. In Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia [AIR 1943 Mad 466] it was held that the mere fact that the suit relates to public trust of religious or charitable nature and the reliefs claimed fall within some of the clauses of sub-section (1) of Section 92 would not by itself attract the operation of the section, unless the suit is of a representative character instituted in the interest of the public and not merely for vindication of the individual or personal rights of the plaintiffs. 26. To put it differently, it is not every suit claiming reliefs specified in Section 92 t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uit which is sought to be initiated by the plaintiffs. ii. Conditions to be fulfilled for the applicability of Section 92 of the CPC 39. Section 92 of the CPC has been created for a specific purpose and to address a specific kind of grievance which has the impact of affecting public rights as enumerated above. Therefore, not all suits can be blindly brought within the fold of this provision. In the facts and circumstances of each case, the court granting leave must examine whether the suit qualifies certain conditions which align with the intent behind the creation of this provision. Courts must tread with caution so as to weed out those suits which are camouflaged as falling within its ambit just with a view to take an undue benefit of provision and for causing harassment to the public trust or for the vindication of personal rights. 40. This Court in Ashok Kumar Gupta (supra) had laid down three conditions which are a sine qua non in order to invoke Section 92 of the CPC and maintain an action under the said provision. Upon placing reliance on various decisions of this Court, the conditions were delineated as follows - (a) the trust in question must be created for public....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 11. The statement of law so laid down was reiterated: 11.1. In Bishwanath v. Radha Ballabhji [Bishwanath v. Radha Ballabhji, (1967) 2 SCR 618 : AIR 1967 SC 1044] : (AIR p. 1046, para 7) "7. It is settled law that to invoke Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 3 conditions have to be satisfied, namely, (i) the trust is created for public purposes of a charitable or religious nature; (ii) there was a breach of trust or a direction of court is necessary in the administration of such a trust; and (iii) the relief claimed is one or other of the reliefs enumerated therein. If any of the 3 conditions is not satisfied, the suit falls outside the scope of the said section." 11.2. In Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia [Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia, (1969) 3 SCR 83 : AIR 1969 SC 884] : (AIR p. 885, para 5) "5. It is evident that this section has no application unless three conditions are fulfilled : (1) the suit must relate to a public charitable or religious trust, (2) the suit must be founded on an allegation of breach of trust or the direction of the court is required for administration of the trust, and (3) the reliefs claimed are those which are me....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....th, with particular focus on providing for the education, treatment and prevention of tuberculosis, has been created for a 'public purpose of charitable nature'. This is clearly evident from its objectives outlined in the MoA and the beneficiaries that it seeks to serve, amongst others. The same is an admitted position and we need not delve into the nitty-gritties of whether the appellant society qualifies this aspect of the aforesaid condition. What remains contested, however, is that the appellant society which has been registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 cannot be construed to be a 'trust' or a 'constructive trust' in order to subject it to the jurisdiction under Section 92 of the CPC. I. Whether a Society can be construed to be a 'trust or a 'constructive trust'? 45. A suit under Section 92 of the CPC being one of special nature, presupposes the existence of a public trust of a religious or charitable character. The existence of a public trust is essential, whether express or constructive. Therefore, a crucial condition that needs satisfaction is whether the institution/organisation in relation to which certain reliefs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....way of trust for a public religious purpose. The grant is to Daryao Gir and his heirs in perpetuity. [ ... ] The general effect of the evidence is that the family have treated the temple as family property, dividing the various forms of profit whether offerings or rents, closing it so as to exclude the public from worship when marriage or other ceremonies required the attendance of the members of the family at its original home, and circumstances it is not enough, in their Lordships' opinion, to deprive the family of their private property to show that Hindus willing to worship have never been turned away or even that the deity has acquired considerable popularity among Hindus of the locality or among persons resorting to the annual mela.Worshippers are naturally welcome at a temple because of the offerings they bring and the repute they give to the idol : they do not have to be turned away on pain of forfeiture of the temple property as having become property belonging to a public trust. Facts and circumstances, in order to be accepted as sufficient proof of dedication of a temple as a public temple, must be considered in their historical setting in such a case as the present;....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re reproduced hereinbelow: "The learned trial Judge discussed in detail and with much care the documentary and oral evidence, particularly in relation to the circumstances in which the various properties used in connection with the Math had been acquired. In appeal the High Court again discussed the evidence in considerable detail, and both Courts reached the conclusions that the institution, whether it be called a Math or a Temple, was founded by the public for a public, charitable and religious purpose, viz., the worship of the Swami during his lifetime and of his Samadhi (tomb) after his death, and for the purpose of the various festivals which had been started in connection with the institution, and that the offerings made to the Swami, the properties purchased out of those offerings and those acquired by gifts after 1912 (when the Swami assumed control of the Math), must all be regarded as accretions to the original foundation, and that all the properties in suit form part of a trust created for purposes of a charitable or religious nature. Counsellor the appellant has referred their Lordships to all the relevant evidence and no useful purpose would be served by a fur....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....that it was necessary to settle a scheme for the administration of the trust. [ ... ]" (Emphasis supplied) 48. This Court in Bihar State Board Religious Trust, Patna v. Mahant Sri Biseshwar Das reported in (1971) 1 SCC 574 had to determine whether the entity in question constituted a religious trust so that it may be brought within the purview of a 'public trust' under Section 2(1) of the Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, 1951. The Trial Court had also placed a lot of importance on ascertaining how the properties were originally acquired and since, the respondent did not produce the Sanads under which the founding Mahant had acquired the said properties and therefore, the nature of the gifts and the manner in which they were made could not be determined, an adverse inference was drawn against the respondent. However, this conclusion was held to be misplaced since the onus of proof to show that the properties were being held for public purposes of a religious or charitable character was said to rest on the appellant Board who alleged that it was so. In holding thus, this Court also observed as follows: i. First, that it is true that a charitable trust might ei....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....The trial Judge was, therefore, clearly in error in holding that the respondent Mahant ought to have produced the Sanads and that on his failure to do so an adverse inference could be drawn, namely, that had they been produced they would have shown that the grants to Gaibi Ramdasji were for public purposes of a religious or charitable character. (See Parmanand v. Nihal Chand.) [1938 ILR 65 IA 252] 11. The Sanads not having been available, the appellant Board tried to establish through the oral evidence of six witnesses (DWs 1 to 6), that the temple was founded and the properties in question were acquired for the benefit of the public or a section thereof.[ ... ] -xxx- 16. True it is that a charitable trust might either be created by a grant for an expresss purpose or a grant having been made in favour of an individual or a class of individuals, that individual or that class of individuals might, after obtaining the grant, create a charitable trust. [ ... ] -xxx- 18. The existence of a private Mutt, where the property was given to the head of the Mutt for his personal benefit only, has in the past been recognised. (See Matam Nadipudi v. Board o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed to whether by the mere use of the premises as a Dharamsala for about 125 years an inference could be drawn that the same belongs to a public trust. Answering in the negative and holding that the Dharamsala was a private property and not a public trust, this Court observed that a dedication for public purposes and for the benefit of the general public would involve the complete cessation of ownership on the part of the founder and vesting of the property for the religious object. However, in circumstances where this dedication is not made via a formal or express endowment, its character may have to be determined on the basis of the history of the institution along with the conduct of the founder and his heirs. A dedication would involve the complete relinquishment of individual right of ownership. The owner must intend to divest himself of his ownership in the dedicated property. The relevant observations are reproduced hereinbelow: "37. From the materials brought on record by the parties, as noticed hereinbefore, the following facts emerge: (1) That the shops were let out to other people. (2) People could come and stay in the Dharamsala but for stay of more than three d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... right of ownership and proprietary. A benevolent act on the part of a ruler of the State for the benefit of the general public may or may not amount to dedication for charitable purpose. 39. When the complete control is retained by the owner - be it appointment of a chowkidar, appropriation of rents, maintenance thereof from his personal funds - dedication cannot be said to be complete. There is no evidence except oral statements of some witnesses to the effect that Raj Kumar Bir Singh became its first trustee. Evidence adduced in this behalf is presumptive in nature. How such trust was administered by Raj Kumar Bir Singh and upon his death by his successors-in-interest has not been disclosed. It appears that the family of the donor retained the control over the property and, therefore, a complete dedication cannot be inferred far less presumed. Furthermore, a trust which has been created may be a private trust or a public trust. The provisions of Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure would be attracted only when a public trust comes into being and not otherwise. -xxx- 42. When a dedication to a charity is sought to be established in absence of an in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rds the benefit of the organization or its objectives, could also lead to an inference as regards the nature of the organization or the creation of a public trust. 53. Bihar State Board (supra) has reiterated that a charitable trust may either be created by a grant for an express purpose or a grant having been made in favour of an individual(s), who might thereafter create a charitable trust. Due attention must also be paid to whether the grant is accompanied with any fetter/obligation or qualified with a condition, either express or implied, regarding its use by the grantee. Therefore, the trifecta i.e., the intention, manner and conditions of the grant might have to be scrutinized to see whether the grant was for the benefit of the public or an unascertained section of the public. The intention to create a trust must be indicated, either by words or acts with reasonable certainty. Other established circumstances, including the method of use of the property and customs of the institution or the mode and manner in which they have dealt with the properties in the past, could also prove to be relevant. 54. Kuldip Chand (supra) had also placed emphasis on the history of the inst....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he trust had been created, - that the entire community in the area took an active interest and contributed funds for the purpose of creating a 'trust fund' in order that the school may be established; A committee was formed for collecting funds either as donations or as share capital; that long before the registration of the society, funds were collected from the public towards share money; and there were other forms of contributions as well. This according to the Full Bench reflected that there existed a clear intention to form a trust and also that a trust fund was created. These funds were utilized for the construction of the school building and for other ancillary purposes including establishing and maintaining the other functions of the school. ii. Secondly, referring to Tudor on Charities, Sixth Edition, pg 128, it was opined that a trust may be created by any language sufficient to show the intention, and no technical words are necessary. Further, it was stated that the use of words such as 'intent' or 'purpose' or a direction that a fund shall be applied by, or be at the disposal of a person for certain intended charitable purposes, may very....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....isions as well relied on by counsel for the appellant. 7. Counsel very strongly relied on the decision in G. Chikka Venkatappa v. D. Hanumanthappa, (1970) 1 Mys LJ 296. The decision is authority for the proposition that the formation of a society under the Societies Registration Act to carry out any charitable or useful or social purpose cannot be regarded as amounting to creation of a trust for the application of Section 92 of the CPC. The effect of the Societies Registration Act is not to invest properties of the society with the character of trust property. Even if the purpose for which the society was formed was charitable purpose the property acquired for this purpose will belong to the society and there is no trust and no trust can be predicated. So it was urged that even if the properties were acquired by the Keralasseri High School Society there was no trust which would enable a suit being instituted in accordance with the provisions of Section 92 of the CPC. If we may say so, with great respect, the position stated in the decision is the correct one. That was stated with reference to the facts of that case and the conclusion arrived at after discussing the facts i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....charitable purposes intended, may be as effectual as the use of the word 'trust'. Even the words 'authorise and empower' may be enough, upon the true construction of the instrument". (See Tudor on Charities, Sixth Edition, Page 128). 10. No corporation would be created within the meaning of the word "incorporated" occurring in Entry 44 of List 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution by the formation and registration of a society under the Societies Registration Act. The society would continue to remain as an unincorporated society though under the Societies Registration Act it would have certain privileges some of them being analogous to those of corporations. See Board of Trustees, Ayurvedic and Unani College, Delhi v. State of Delhi, AIR 1962 SC 458. If there was a trust created by the public for a public charitable purpose namely establishing, maintaining and running a school the fact of the registration of a society could not change the character of the properties which had already been constituted as trust properties and impressed with the trust and any addition to those properties must also have the same character. 11. We have therefore....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nnection with the Silver Jubilee Building Fund of the Sangha. The suit was decreed and while the first prayer was not granted, the second prayer was granted only against two out of the five defendants. The High Court while holding that the suit was entirely misconceived on law and also wholly unnecessary on facts, observed as follows: i. First, that the words 'creation of a trust' under Section 92 obviously has reference to similar phraseology employed in the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 although the same pertains to 'private trust'. 'Trust' is therefore, an obligation annexed to the ownership of property. ii. Secondly, due regard was given to the object behind the enactment of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Mysore Societies Registration Act of 1904 respectively, along with the express provisions in those legislations which provided that the property, whether moveable or immoveable, belonging to a society shall be deemed to be vested in the Governing Body of the Society unless it is separately vested in trustees. While also referring to the provisions which provide that a society may sue or be sued, it was concluded that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... [ ... ] There is in Bangalore an association called the Devanga Sangha, which was registered as a society on the 12th of February 1924 under the Mysore Societies Registration Act of 1904. Like all other societies of that nature, the Sangha is governed by a Memorandum of Association, a set of Articles of Association and subsidiary bye-laws framed by the Society. The objects of the Sangha set out in the Memorandum are to advance the educational, economic and social welfare of the members of the Devanga community who are a section of Hindus. The membership is limited to those belonging to the said community and is subject to payment of donations or periodical subscriptions. There are, as in other cases, different classes of members like Patrons who are called by two different Kannada names 'Poshaka and Sahavaka', Life members. Hon. members and ordinary members. The management of affairs of the Sangha is vested in a body called the Executive Council consisting of a President, four Vice-Presidents, a Secretary, a Treasurer and 50 other members. -xxx- 16. It is clear that the trust referred to in this section is one actually created for a public purpose, whethe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 18. The obvious legal effect of these provisions is that although the object of a society may be described as a charitable purpose and by its regulations it is empowered to acquire property and use the same for achieving its objects, the property belongs to the society and is owned by the society like any other individual, because, the society is itself invested with the character of a legal person by virtue of the provisions of the statute. It is not property in respect of which it is possible to predicate a trust, an author of the trust and a transfer of the said property as trust property to any trustee, nor can it be said that whenever a society acquires property, it declares itself as a trustee in respect of that property. The obligation to use the property for purposes of the society is an obligation which is inherent or implicit in the Memorandum of Association which is the basic document constituting the society. That does not amount to nor can it be, by any stretch of imagination, read as amounting to any declaration of trust in respect of a specified property. 19. Such being the clear position in law in regard to trusts and in regard to registered societies and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....5 of the 1956 Act). In all these cares, it was held that the fact that the trusteeship vested in a Committee of persons, whether incorporated or not, made no difference to treating them as trustees for the purpose of S. 92 CPC. But that does not carry the plaintiffs' case any further in this case. In every one of these decided cases, there was a clear creation of a trust for public purposes within the meaning of S. 92 CPC. as explained by us. In every case, there was already either a temple with endowed properties managed by the Area Committee or an actual transfer of property on trust by the founder of the school in favour of the Committee or the collection of funds by an informal committee for a specified public purpose amounting in law to a declaration of trust by themselves. 30. But one case which comes very near the present case is that in P. Mahadevayya's case [53 Mys H.C.R. 167] . That was a case of a registered society formed for the educational advancement of the Veerasaiva community which became the victim of serious differences of opinion between its members resulting in a split threatening to put an end to the useful activities of the society. A suit wa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... us we do not consider it to be a clear authority in support of the proposition sought to be made by Mr. Nagaraja Rao on behalf of the plaintiffs. If the decision should be regarded as laying down by implication, that even in the case of an ordinary society registered under the Societies Registration Act, a matter exclusively and completely governed by the provisions of the said Act and the general law, can be brought within the scope of S. 92 CPC. as if the position is clearly one of creation of a trust for public purposes, with respect, we find ourselves unable to agree with it." (Emphasis supplied) 61. On the other hand, the High Court of Bombay in Shri Dnyaneshwar Madhuradwait Sampradayik Mandal, Amravati v. Charity Commissioner, Bombay and another reported in 1980 SCC OnLine Bom 120 while dealing with Section 2(13) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 observed that a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 having an object which is religious or charitable or both, would be covered by the definition of a 'public trust' under Section 2(13). However, the said observation was made since the aforesaid State legislation which governed public trus....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d in Trust, thereby meaning constructive charitable trust of a public nature. This contention, in our opinion, is totally devoid of any merit in view of the fact that Section 11 of the said Act does not at all either expressly or impliedly purport to create a charitable trust of a public nature. St. Thomas School and its property have to be administered in accordance with the provisions of St. Thomas School Act 1923 and if there is any breach of the provision of the Act then the remedy is to be sought under the said Act. The mode of constitution of the Board of Governors had been specifically laid down in S. 2 of the said Act. In these circumstances the contention that the St. Thomas School is a public charitable trust cannot be sustained. Hence the instant suit filed under Section 92 of the Civil P.C. with the leave of the Court granted under the said section is not competent and the ex parte leave that was granted is liable to be revoked and withdrawn. [ ... ]I have already held that the St. Thomas School and its properties do not constitute a public charitable trust at all but they are governed by the provisions of the St. Thomas School Act, 1923 (Bengal Act XII of 1923)." (E....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the Society, if such properties were already with the trustees. In other words, the registration of a Trust as a Society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 would not alter the position and the properties belonging to the trust would not vest in the society but the trustees would continue to be the legal owners of such properties. -xxx- 21. In the present case, there are neither pleadings nor evidence to show that any funds were collected from the general public before the Defendants No. 1 and 2 came to be registered as Societies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Therefore there was no trust as such and vide Section 20 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, all moneys received by the Defendants No. 1 and 2 either by way of grants-in-aid or in the form of contributions from the public would vest in the societies, that is, Defendants No. 1 and 2. -xxx- 24. In the present case, the very first condition is lacking. As stated above, it is the admitted case of the Plaintiff that Defendants No. 1 and 2 are "societies" registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. There is no averment and/or evidence that any trust was expre....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h of imagination can it be considered as a declaration of trust. ii. Secondly, on a reading of Section 8 of the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific, and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955, which is pari materia to Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, it was inferred that unless the properties had already vested separately in trustees, they shall vest in the governing body of the society. iii. Thirdly, it was opined that a procedure for the removal of the existing governing body, appointment of a fresh governing body and framing a scheme for the better and efficient management of the society was already contemplated within the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific, and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. Such a relief could be availed by the members of the society as well, however, provided that a minimum of 10% of the members on the rolls of the society join together. It was opined that this express provision cannot be sought to be circumvented by the aggrieved members of the society by making an allegation that the society is a public trust and adopting the route under Section 92 of the CPC instead. iv. Lastly, while a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ress. The society shall aim at- (a) Improving the social and non-social environment of the mental hospitals of Kerala. (b) Providing the mentally ill with facilities to improve their life conditions. (c) Rehabilitating the recovered patients, especially those who are unwanted by their families." [ ... ] Clause 10 deals with the capital of the society, which reads as follows :- "10. The required capital of the society shall be raised by the membership and subscription fees and donations, loans, grants and other voluntary contributions from the public State and Central Governments and other institutions or organisations. " [ ... ] 8. It is true that Clause 4 of the Rules and Regulations shows that the Society is constituted with the main objectives of rendering service of the mentally ill, alcoholics and drug addicts, women in distress and children and other groups in distress. But, there is absolutely nothing in the Rules and Regulations of Memorandum of Association to show that prior to the formation and registration, of the society there was a trust haying any property. On the other hand, a reading of the memorandum of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the governing body of the society. [ ... ] Section 25 deals with application to court for dissolution framing schemes, etc. Section 25 reads as follows :- "25. Application to Court for dissolution, framing a scheme, etc. - (1) When an application is made by the State Government or ten per cent of the members on the rolls of a society to the District Court within the jurisdiction of which the society is registered, the Court may, after enquiry and on being satisfied that it is just and equitable pass any of the following orders :- (a) removing the existing governing body and appointing a fresh governing body; or (b) framing a scheme for the better and efficient management of the society; or (c) dissolving the Society. (2) Where the application under sub-section (1) is by the members of the society, the applicant shall deposit in Court along with the application the sum of one hundred rupees in cash as security for costs." Section 25 makes it very clear that a suit can be filed before the District Court by 10% of the members of the society against the Society for removing the existing governing body and appointing a fresh governi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be a specified group or general public. Trust may be either express or constructive. But, a trust is created only when the author of the trust indicates with reasonable certainty by words or act the intention in his part to create a trust, beneficiary and the trust property. The subject matter of a trust must be a property transferable to the beneficiary. It must not be merely a beneficial interest. 12. In Kesava Panicker v. Damodara Panicker 1975 Ker LT 797: (AIR 1976 Kerala 86) a Full Bench of this Court considered the effect of the subsequent registration of a society. [ ... ] That principle was followed in Sukumaran v. Akamala Sree Dharma Sastha Idol (1992) 1 Ker LT 432: (AIR 1992 Kerala 406), but in both those cases there were materials to show that a public trust was in existence and later that trust got registered under the provisions of Act XII of 1955. I shall consider whether there is any material in this case to show that the 1st petitioner was a trust and later it got itself registered under the provisions of Act XII of 1955. 13. [ ... ] A reading of various averments in the Original Petition shows that though the word "Trust" is used to describe the 1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o hear the respondent before granting leave. It is true that in B.S. Adityan v. B. Ramachandran Adityan 2004 AIR SCW 3044: (AIR 2004 SC 3448), the Apex Court has held that leave can be granted without issuing notice to the respondent. But in the very same decision it was also held that the respondent after appearing in the suit, can file petition to revoke the leave already granted. So, there is no merit in the contention of the contesting respondent that if there are averments in the petition regarding the existence of trust, the District Court shall entertain the application and grant leave. 18. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 6 has argued that the scope of enquiry in an Original Petition is very limited and the District Court has merely to see whether there is prima facie case for granting the relief. [ ... ] It is true that the plaintiff need only establish a prima facie case of existence of a trust. But, there must be materials to make a prima facie case of existence of a trust. There is total lack of any such materials in this case. -xxx- 21. The learned District Judge allowed the Original Petition on a wrong assumption that the 1st pet....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....owering the President to sell the properties. That itself indicates that it is not a Trust. The fact that it was registered under the Societies Act may also lend support to the above view. -xxx- 14. In this case also the property vest with the President and Secretary of the first defendant as per clause 23 of the Memorandum of Articles of Association of the first defendant Institution, which was registered under the Societies Registration Act 21/1860. Therefore, the property is vested with a society and not with a Trust and as per the observations made in the above cited case a suit under Section 92, CPC is not maintainable, (to) which Societies Registration Act is applicable, proceeding with a suit under Section 92, CPC was deprecated in Babaji Kondaji Garad v. Nasik Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd., Nasik ((1984) 2 SCC 50 : AIR 1984 SC 192). There is also no interestedness shown upon the plaintiffs in the running of the Trust." (Emphasis supplied) 67. In S.R. Bahuguna (supra), the Delhi High Court had held that the suit under Section 92 was not maintainable for not having satisfied two crucial ingredients i.e., the defendant no. 1 was a society and not a p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ainable, because two crucial ingredients, which are essential pre-requisites for action under Section 92 are lacking; the first, defendant is a society, and not a public charitable Trust. The Trust which had been set up earlier was dissolved in 1997; that has not been disputed. The suit was filed in 2001. Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act 1860, says that the property and assets of a registered society vest either in a trust, set up for that purpose, or the society's governing council or body. This however, does not mean that the governing body members if no trust is created to manage the society's assets, become trustees. No authority was shown to advance such an argument. The second ingredient, i.e. the plaintiffs being 'persons interested' is also lacking, in this case. 17. For the above reasons, the plaintiffs cannot be granted leave to file a suit, under Section 92 of the CPC. The suit and all pending applications are, therefore, dismissed without any order on costs." (Emphasis supplied) 68. In Young Mens Christian Association of Ernakulam (supra), the plaintiffs alleged before the Delhi High Court that the defendant society owned ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... in India but is also affiliated to the international network of YMCAs. It has been clearly created for a 'public purpose' and is both of a charitable and a religious nature. 12. The Defendant has two bodies which manage and administer its duties and functions. The National Board is the governing body of the Defendant and under Article III(1), the management of the society vests with it. [ ... ] 13. As per Article X of the rules and regulations, all the property of the society is deemed to vest in the National Board which consists of all the members of the National Executive, Secretary members, immediate past National President, and Chairmen of the National Standing Committees, etc. 14. The second body is the National Executive which is primarily an elected body [ ... ] 15. Article X is relevant for the present purpose and is set out herein below: "X (1). All property of the Society, whether movable or immovable, shall be deemed to be vested in the National Board who shall have power to sell, lease, mortgage or otherwise deal with the same, and also to purchase, take on lease, accept, grants of or otherwise acquire movable or imm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onfidence being accepted for the benefit of another. 21. If these elements are satisfied, a trust is created. 22. In this backdrop, a perusal of Section 92 of the CPC reveals that the term "express or constructive trust" does not relate to a trust constituted under the Indian Trusts Act, but any body or entity which holds in trust any property and is created for public purposes of a charitable or religious nature. A society can also satisfy the test of express or constructive trust created for public purposes. 23. In Abhaya (supra) cited by the Defendant, the case involved a charitable Society which did not show that it held 'in trust' any property belonging to a different organisation. The property vested in the governing body of the Society itself. Thus, the Kerala High Court held that a suit under Section 92 of the CPC would not be maintainable. [ ... ] 24. Thus, in the facts of the said case, the Court held that there was no prima facie material to show existence of a trust. 25. Even in Rukmini Devi Arundale (supra), the Court held that the question was as to whether the property belonged to the Trust or the Society. In Bhart....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....perties or its assets and it has been 'vested' in its Executive Committee only as per the mandate under Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 which reads as thus: "5. Property of society how vested .- The property, movable and immovable, belonging to a society registered under this Act, if not vested in trustees, shall be deemed to be vested, for the time being, in the governing body of such society, and in all proceedings, civil and criminal, may be described as the property of the governing body of such society by their proper title." 72. A five-judge bench of this Court in Board of Trustees, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibia College, Delhi v. State of Delhi and Another reported in 1961 SCC OnLine SC 145 while deciding a challenge to a State legislation, had the occasion to decide whether an entity registered as a society can be considered to be a 'corporation'. Answering in the negative, it was stated that the most important aspect in resolving the said issue would be to determine whether there was an intention to incorporate. Upon perusal of the various provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, it was concluded that there were no suffic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s or governing body for the time being. Section 6 gives the society the right to sue or be sued in the name of the president, chairman etc. and Section 7 provides that no suit or proceeding in a civil court shall abate by reason of the death etc. of the person by or against whom the suit has been brought. Section 8 again says that any judgment obtained in a suit brought by or against the society shall be enforced against it. It has been submitted before us that Sections 6, 7 and 8 clothe the society with a legal personality and a perpetual succession; and Section 10 enables the members of the society to be sued as strangers, in certain circumstances, by the society, and the costs awarded to the defendant in such a suit may be recovered, at his election, from the officer in whose name the suit was brought. Dealing with very similar provisions (Sections 7, 8 and 9) of the English Trade Union Act, 1871 (34 and 35 Vict. c. 31) Lord Lindley said in the celebrated case of Taff Vale Railway v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants [1901 AC 426] [ ... ] -xxx- 13. It is clear from the aforesaid decision that provisions similar to the provisions of Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y of the society, clarified that, during the subsistence of the society, the right of the members was to ensure that the property was utilised for the charitable objects as set out in its memorandum and as such, that did not include any beneficial enjoyment on the part of the board members. The members also do not acquire any beneficial interest vis-à-vis the property on the dissolution of the society since Section 14 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 expressly negatives the right of the members of the society to any distribution of the assets of the dissolved body. Upon dissolution, the property has to be given over to some other society to be utilised for like purposes and the only right of the members was to determine which society the funds or property might be transferred to. The aforesaid right of the members to determine which new society the funds and property may be transferred to, was held to be not a right to "acquire, hold and dispose of property" within the meaning of the then Article 19(1)(f). The context in which the words "dispose of" occurred in Article 19(1)(f) was said to denote that the kind of property which a citizen has a right to hold and upon d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e utilised for like purposes, and the only right of the members was to determine the society to whom the funds or property might be transferred and this had to be done by not less than three-fifths of the members present at the meeting for the purpose and, in default of such determination, by the civil court. The effect of the impugned legislation is to vary or affect this privilege of the members and to vest the property in a new body created by it enjoined to administer it so as to serve the same purposes as the dissolved society. The only question is whether the right to determine the body which shall administer the funds or property of the dissolved society which they had under the pre-existing law is a right to "acquire, hold and dispose of property" within the meaning of Article 19(1)(f), and if so whether the legislation is not saved by Article 19(5). We are clearly of the opinion that that right is not a right of property within the meaning of Article 19(1)(f). In the context in which the words "to dispose of" occur in Article 19(1)(f), they denote that kind of property which a citizen has a right to hold - the right to dispose of being part of or being incidental to the ri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nies Act. We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that neither the provisions of the Act nor the Rules framed thereunder contemplate that the societies registered under the Societies Registration Act would qualify to be considered as a company for the purpose of Sections 223 and 236. 21. A society registered under the Societies Registration Act is not a body corporate as is the case in respect of a company registered under the Companies Act. In that view of the matter, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act is not a juristic person. The law for the purpose of grant of a probate or Letter of Administration recognises only a juristic person and not a mere conglomeration of persons or a body which does not have any statutory recognition as a juristic person. 22. It is well known that there exist certain salient differences between a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, on the one hand, and a company corporate, on the other, principal amongst which is that a company is a juristic person by virtue of being a body corporate, whereas the society, even when it is registered, is not possessed of these characteristics. Moreover, a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Administration. It would be open to the respondent Society to nominate any of its office-bearers to whom the Letter of Administration is granted. Such nominated person may move an application for substitution of his name for grant of the Letter of Administration. If such amendment application is made, the High Court shall permit this amendment and grant the Letter of Administration in favour of the person nominated by the Society for carrying out the wishes of the testator which is for the benefit of the Society." (Emphasis supplied) 75. In Tata Memorial Hospital Workers Union v. Tata Memorial Centre and Another reported in (2010) 8 SCC 480, this court considered in detail the effect of Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Therein, the Rules and Regulations of the respondent society had provided for the vesting of certain properties in the governing body of the society distinct from what was or may be vested separately in the trustees. While explaining the raison d'être behind Section 5, it was opined that: i. First, the deeming provision, by default, creates a fictional vesting in favour of the governing body of the society and not a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gical, laboratory, workshop or of any other kind), books and journals, furniture, furnishings and fixtures belonging to the Centre." 69. However, even when it comes to the immovable properties, Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act provides for deemed vesting of the properties belonging to a society into the governing body of such society. Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act reads as follows: "5. Property of society how vested .- The property, movable or immovable, belonging to a society registered under this Act, if not vested in trustees, shall be deemed to be vested, for the time being, in the governing body of such society, and in all proceedings, civil and criminal, may be described as the property of the governing body of such society by their proper title." 70. In this behalf, we must keep in mind, the raison d'être of the above referred to Section 5 that once a trust is established and a society is registered for the administration of the trust, the statute contemplates that the society should be fully autonomous and that the lack of actual transfer of property of the trust should not prevent the governing body in its admin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... service. Hence, in view of the above referred to factual as well as legal scenario the first issue will have to be decided that the property dedicated to the first respondent will be deemed to be vested in the Governing Council of the first respondent Society." (Emphasis supplied) 77. What follows from a conspectus of the aforesaid decisions discussing Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the vesting of property in the governing body of the society is that, a society registered under the aforesaid Act is not a juristic person or a body corporate capable of holding property by itself. It is for this reason that a fictional vesting of the 'property belonging to the society' has been made in favour of the governing body of the society. 78. However, it is to be noted that the property can also be held in trust by certain trustees and this is evident from the use of the phrase "if not vested in trustees". Several decisions have interpreted this to mean that there must be certain circumstances which give rise to the existence of a trust prior to the registration of the entity/institution as a society. However, it is our view that the aforesaid phrase ca....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....trustees. Further, the existence of an unequivocal trust deed executed by the society or its member representative, in favour of another trustee, for the purpose of holding its properties, could also seal the deal as far as the separate creation of a trust is concerned. All these could be a pertinent factors in determining the existence of a trust, separate from the governing body of the society, in which the property belonging to the society is vested. In this scenario, such a trust could be subjected to the jurisdiction under Section 92 of the CPC provided the other conditions for its invocation are met. 80. In the absence of the creation of a trust as aforesaid, property would be deemed to be vested in the governing body only. The governing body of the society upon which property is otherwise vested is duty bound to ensure that the property is put towards and utilised for the purposes/aims of the society as laid out in its Memorandum of Association or any Rules and Regulations governing the said matter. In case the society is dissolved, a decision must be made to transfer or vest all the property in another society working towards a like cause and the members would not have a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....been created. 83. In our opinion, the reason behind the use of the word "trustees" in the phrase "if not vested in trustees", is a reflection of the intention of the legislature that the vesting of the property belonging to the society cannot be made in a casual manner to any and all persons regardless of any obligation. For argument, let's say that the phrase instead read as "if not vested in any person". In such a scenario, the persons in whom the property of the society vested would be able to possibly assert their own individual title or a competing claim to the property. This would give rise to a conflicting situation and deviate from the original purpose for which the property belonging to the society came to be vested in a third person. This is precisely the reason due to which the word "trustees" has been used under Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. While interpreting the words employed in Section 5, we must not detract from the underlying purpose and objective for which it came to be enacted. Legislative creativity was employed to ensure that the incapability of the society to hold the property by itself does not have any practical effect on its abi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Therefore, perpetuity is assigned not only to the identity of the society but also to the properties which belong to it, provided the society is not dissolved. This adds to the reason that the governing body also acts within the contours of a strict fiduciary relationship. 85. Therefore, while it cannot be considered as an 'express trust', what must also be noted, at this crucial juncture, is that, for an entity to be brought within the rigours of Section 92, the plaintiff has the option of also contending that a 'constructive trust' exists in the circumstances and a breach of such a constructive trust has occurred or that the directions of the Court are necessary for the administration of such a constructive trust. d. The doctrine of constructive trust and its applicability to a society functioning for public purposes of a religious or charitable nature 86. In light of the discussion in the preceding paragraphs, we are tasked with determining whether a constructive trust could be created in a circumstance wherein a society vests its property in its governing body through the deeming fiction employed under Section 5 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ertainty, there is not sufficient clearness to make it certain that the words of trust were intended to be imperative, or to make it certain what was precisely the subject intended to be affected, or to make it certain what were the interests to be enjoyed by the objects." (Emphasis supplied) 88. The aforesaid principle has been codified in Indian jurisprudence under the Indian Trust Act, 1882 governing private trust which defines a private trust as a an obligation annexed to the ownership of property and arising out of a confidence reposed in and accepted by the owner, or declared and accepted by him, for the benefit of another, or of another and the owner. While we are not directly importing the aforesaid principles laid out under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, which governs private trusts, for application to a 'public trust', these principles aid in construing how an express trust, whether public or private, may be created. P Ramantha Aiyar in his Advanced Law Lexicon also adds that it is not necessary that the word 'trust' be used. The trust would be express even if it has to be made out from the terms of an instrument. Therefore, a declared and ascert....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ciary element would serve as a bedrock for the declaration of a constructive trust. The circumstances which give rise to it may or may not involve a fiduciary relation - at least, this is the proposition laid down under American jurisprudence. Quoting the observations of Cardozo, J. in Beatty v. Guggenhein Exploration Co. reported in (1919) 225 N. Y. 380 - "a constructive trust is a formula through which the conscience of equity finds expression. When property has been acquired in such circumstances that the holder of legal title may not in good conscience retain the beneficial interest, equity converts him into a trustee". In his subsequent decision rendered in Meinhard v. Salmon reported in (1928) 249 N.Y. 458, he also observed that - "A constructive trust is then the remedial device through which the preference of the self is made subordinate to loyalty to others". It is, therefore, designed to prevent fraud or other inequity. In applying this doctrine, courts be said to also resort to the maxim - "equity regards as done that which ought to be done". According to American jurisprudence, an express trust is a substantive institution whereas a constructive trust is purely a remedi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....usp in the change of approach by the American Courts (from the English model to a remedial one) because in Campbell v. Drake reported in 39 N.C. 94 (1845), on similar facts, the Supreme Court of North Carolina had held that where a clerk in a store pilfered money and goods from his employer and uses those proceeds in the purchase of a tract of land, the employer who was robbed could neither hold the clerk nor his representatives after his death, as trustees of the land for the benefit of the employer, so as to enable him to call for a conveyance of the legal title to himself. To further elaborate, Campbell (supra) held as follows: "Nevertheless, we believe the bill cannot be sustained. The object of it is to have the land itself, claiming it as if it had been purchased for the plaintiff by an agent expressly constituted; and it seems to us, thus stated, to be a bill of the first impression. We will not say, if the plaintiff had obtained judgment against the administrator for the money as a debt, that he might not come here to have the land declared liable, as a security, for the money laid out for it. But that is not the object of this suit. It is to get the land, which th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hrough an abuse of trust or by the wrongful acts of a trustee to whom the possession of that trust property was confided. This must not be countenanced, according to the Court. The relevant observations are thus: "It is insisted by the counsel for the defendants that the doctrine which subjects property acquired by the fraudulent misuse of trust moneys by a trustee to the influence of the trust, and converts it into trust property and the wrong-doer into a trustee at the election of the beneficiary, has no application to a case where money or property acquired by felony has been converted into other property. There is, it is said, in such cases, no trust relation between the owner of the stolen property and the thief, and the law will not imply one for the purpose of subjecting the avails of the stolen property to the claim of the owner. It would seem to be an anomaly in the law, if the owner who has been deprived of his property by a larceny should be less favorably situated in a court of equity, in respect to his remedy to recover it, or the property into which it had been converted, than one who, by an abuse of trust, has been injured by the wrongful act of a trustee to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....exas 134, 138, 189 S.W. (2d) 471, the court quoted with approval the general rule as to the use of the constructive trust thus stated in Ruling Case Law: "It is a well settled general rule that if one person obtains the legal title to property, not only by fraud, or by violation of confidence of fiduciary relations, but in any other unconscientious manner, so that he cannot equitably retain the property which really belongs to another, equity carrier out its theory of a double ownership, equitable and legal, by impressing a constructive trust upon the property in favor of the one who is in good conscience entitled to it, and who is considered in equity as the beneficial owner." See also 54 Am. Jur., pp. 167-169, Sec. 218. It has been said that "The specific instances in which equity impresses a constructive trust are numberless, -- as numberless as the modes by which property may be obtained through bad faith and unconsientious acts." Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence, (5th Ed.) Vol. 4, p. 97, Sec. 1045. A few cases will be cited where trusts have been raised on account of facts like, or somewhat like, those in the instant case. -xxx- The argume....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be impressed upon the property in favour of the one who is, in good conscience, entitled to it and who would be considered as its beneficial owner in equity. It may be when one person obtains legal title to property by (a) fraud, or (b) violation of confidence of fiduciary relations, or (c) in any other unconscientious manner, such that he cannot equitably retain the property which belongs to another. Further, it was added that there may be a numberless amount of situations, as numberless as the modes by which the property may be obtained through bad faith and unconscientious acts, wherein equity can impress a constructive trust. 97. In McAnulty v. Std. Ins. Co. reported in (2023) 81 F.4th 1091, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was faced with a dispute over the life insurance proceeds between a decedent's ex-wife and his wife during his death. The ex-wife complained of unjust enrichment and imposition of a constructive trust on her behalf. The decedent's only life insurance policy named his wife as the beneficiary while a divorce decree between the decedent and his ex-wife required him to maintain a $10,000 life insurance policy with the plaintiff....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onstructive trust in this case." (Emphasis supplied) 98. Therefore, the American approach is that there is no unyielding formula to which a court of equity is bound to, in deciding whether a constructive trust can be imposed since it is the equity of the transaction which will shape the measure of the relief. To put it simply, the focus of judicial enquiry would shift from the establishment of a fiduciary/confidential relationship and its abuse, to a determination of only whether someone has been unjustly enriched and should therefore, be subject to an 'equitable duty' to return the unjust benefit. 99. On the other hand, English courts have stuck to the institutional model which is underpinned by the existence of a fiduciary/confidential relationship between the person(s) upon whom a constructive trust is imposed and the person(s) in whose favour it is created. Since the imposition of a constructive trust would have an impact on property rights, the English Court are circumspect in imposing it for the bare reason that justice be done inter se parties. According to English jurisprudence, a constructive trust is an institution very much like the express trust - a tru....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ase also for the beneficiary and it was observed as thus: "If a trustee on the refusal of a lessor to renew a lease to the trust were permitted to take a lease for himself, few leases would ever be renewed in favour of trusts. This prohibition was wholly understandable at that time. Many ecclesiastical, charitable and public bodies were by law restricted as to the length of leases which they were able to grant and leases were therefore renewed more or less as a matter of right. By taking a renewal of a lease for himself, a trustee was therefore in practice depriving the trust of a grant which it had a right to expect." 101. In Paragon Finance plc v. Thakerar & Co. reported in (1999) 1 All ER 400, the Court of Appeal highlighted a fine distinction between the use of the words 'constructive trust' and 'constructive trustee' by equity lawyers in two entirely different situations. The first, is where, a person, though not expressly appointed as a trustee, has assumed the duties of a trustee and is holding property by virtue of a lawful transaction or legal arrangement and subsequently, commits a breach of trust. The legal arrangement through which he assumes....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....intend to create a trust from the outset and which is not impugned by the plaintiff. His possession of the property is coloured from the first by the trust and confidence by means of which he obtained it, and his subsequent appropriation of the property to his own use is a breach of that trust. Well-known examples of such a constructive trust are McCormick v Grogan (1869_LR 4 HL 82 (a case of a secret trust) and Rochefoucald v Boustead [1897] 1 Ch 196 (where the defendant agreed to buy property for the plaintiff but the trust was imperfectly recorded). Pallant v Morgan [1952] 2 All ER 951, [1953] Ch 43 (where the defendant sought to keep for himself property which the plaintiff trusted him to buy for both parties) is another. In these cases the plaintiff does not impugn the transaction by which the defendant obtained control of the property. He alleges that the circumstances in which the defendant obtained control make it unconscionable for him thereafter to assert a beneficial interest in the property. The second class of case is different. It arises when the defendant is implicated in a fraud. Equity has always given relief against fraud by making any person sufficiently....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne hand, and the analogous relationship between a fiduciary and principal on the other. Therefore, when unauthorised profits were made by the fiduciary, he became a constructive trustee of the said monies immediately upon its receipt under an institutional constructive trust. This principle, that a trustee or fiduciary hold such profits upon an immediate institutional constructive trust for the beneficiary cannot be said to depend upon the fact that the fiduciary acted dishonestly. This rule of equity must not be solely anchored on the existence of fraud or the absence of bona fides on part of the fiduciary. A constructive trust can be imposed in the absence of fraud as well. ii. Secondly, when the unauthorised profits are dissipated, the constructive trustee is said to have breached his duties because, at the very least, he must conserve the said property/money for the benefit of the beneficiary and not deploy it in such a manner which destroys the beneficiary's proprietary interest in it. The relevant observations are thus: "21. [ ... ] First, there is no fundamental difference between the relationship between trustee and beneficiary and the analogo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... HPII, so that from the moment of its receipt it was beneficially owned by HPII. Furthermore, to the extent that there is any discernible distinction between Keech v Sandford and this appeal, it is that this is a plain case of fraud, whereas the older case was not. But the principle that a trustee or fiduciary holds such profits upon an immediate institutional constructive trust for the beneficiary does not depend at all upon the fiduciary having acted dishonestly. As Lord Russell of Killowen put it in relation to the parallel liability to account in Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 at 144: "The rule of equity which insists on those, who by use of a fiduciary position make a profit, being liable to account for that profit, in no way depends on fraud, or absence of bona fides". -xxx- 29. [ ... ] This is not how the constructive trust arises. It is equity's automatic and immediate response to a set of facts, just as is the common intention trust which ordinarily comes into existence when two people together buy a home which is conveyed into the name of one of them, with the mutual intent that they should be co- owners of it. -xxx....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by a person in circumstances where it would be inequitable to allow said person to assert full beneficial ownership of the property. Therefore, it is imposed not necessarily to effectuate an expressed or implied intention but to redress a wrong. It is the result of judicial intervention. A constructive trustee is not necessarily a trustee in the traditional sense but is nevertheless treated as such by equity. While English courts emphasize on a pre- existing and underlying fiduciary obligation, American courts are much more liberal with the concept and impose it as a remedy where circumstances warrant such intervention. 105. Most common law jurisdictions are accepting towards the doctrine of constructive trust as adopted in England i.e., the institutional model rather than a purely remedial one. Therefore, jurisprudentially there would remain no bar for India to also adopt such an approach. We say so also because, the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (although dealing with private trusts) recognises the concept of an English 'constructive trust'. Under Chapter IX titled 'Obligation in the nature of trusts' delineates several provisions wherein a resulting or a construct....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....: 8. Where a debtor becomes his creditor's legal representative (Section 87): 9. Where a pecuniary advantage is gained by a person in a fiduciary character (Section 88): 10. Where an advantage is gained by the exercise of undue influence (Section 89): 11. Where an advantage is gained by a tenant for life or other qualified owner in derogation of the rights of other persons interested in the property (Section 90): 12. Where property is acquired with notice of an existing contract affecting it (Section 91): 13. Where a person contracts to buy property to be held on trust (Section 92): 14. Where one of several compounding creditors, by a secret arrangement with the debtor, gains an advantage over his co- creditors (Section 93): The Bill also contains a general clause (Section 94) providing for cases not so specified. It is believed that this clause will cover that form of constructive trust which the Punjab Courts have held to arise when a co-sharer in a village community absents himself without expressly abandoning his rights." (Emphasis supplied) 106. It is evident from the Statement of Objects and Rea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or on whose account the money was received. It was reiterated that a constructive trust arises by operation of law, irrespective of whether the parties harboured any intention to create a trust. The relevant observations are reproduced as thus: "32. A constructive trust arises by operation of law, without regard to the intention of the parties to create a trust. It does not require a deed signifying the institution of trust. Under a constructive trust, the trust arises by operation of law as from the date of the circumstances which give rise to it. The function of the court is only to declare that such a trust has arisen in the past. 33. Constructive trust can arise over a wide range of situations. To quote Cardozo, J., "a constructive trust is a formula through which the conscience of equity finds expression". 34. Story on Equity Jurisprudence has explained "Constructive Trust" as: "One of the most common cases in which a Court of equity acts upon the ground of implied trusts in invitum, is where a party has received money which he cannot conscientiously withhold from another party. It has been well remarked, that the receiving of money which co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t, but the person having possession of property has not the whole beneficial interest therein, he must hold the property for the benefit of the persons having such interest, or the residue thereof (as the case may be), to the extent necessary to satisfy their just demands. " 37. In Gopal L. Raheja v. Vijay B. Raheja [Gopal L. Raheja v. Vijay B. Raheja, 2007 SCC OnLine Bom 399 : (2007) 4 Bom CR 288], the Bombay High Court restrained itself from exercising its equitable jurisdiction to apply the English doctrine of constructive trust when the legislature had specifically deleted it from the Trusts Act. 38. In our view, the repeal of Section 94 of the Act does not put any fetter in declaring a trust, even if the situation falls outside the purview of the Act. Its jurisdiction can be derived from Section 151 CPC and Section 88 of the Trusts Act. (Emphasis supplied) 108. In Janardan Dagdu Khomane (supra), this Court also noted that Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 provides that if a person is in a fiduciary relation to another, he cannot take advantage of that position so as to gain something exclusively for himself, which he otherwise would not have obt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... grants-in-aid or otherwise, both within and outside India. Article 11.2.3.5 allows for the Executive Committee to raise loans for the purpose of furthering the objects of the appellant Society. Article 11.2.3.6 allows the receiving of monies, securities, instruments, investments or any other assets for and on behalf of the appellant Society. Article 13, in the most unambiguous manner states that funds will be raised by way of grants-in-aid, donations, gifts, subscription fees and income from investments, loans and other means available to the Society and that they will be used to carry out the aims and objectives of the Society. 111. A perusal of the MoA and AoA of the appellant society reveals that it is a society of a charitable nature, having its properties vested in the governing body, who act as its fiduciaries. As elaborated previously, any conduct by the fiduciary which deprived the intended beneficiaries of their beneficial interest in the property, in such a manner that is in contravention to the covenants that bind him and confers an advantage to him to the detriment of the intended beneficiaries, must be taken into consideration to see if a constructive trust can be ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Syed Mohd. Salie Labbai v. Mohd. Hanifa reported in (1976) 4 SCC 780. Therein, it was held that a suit against persons exercising de facto control over property which has been dedicated for public use, would be maintainable, specifically when such properties are alleged to have been mismanaged and not maintained. The relevant observations are thus: "64. [...] It is true that Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies only when there is any alleged breach of any express or constructive trust created for a public, charitable or religious purpose. It also applies where the direction of the court is necessary for the administration of any such public trust. In the instant case the defendants have no doubt been looking after the properties in one capacity or the other and had been enjoying the usufruct thereof. They are, therefore, trustees de son tort and the mere fact that they put forward their own title to the properties would not make them trespassers [ ... ] We, therefore, hold that Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure is clearly applicable to the case. 65. Counsel for the appellants lastly argued that there is no evidence to show that the appellants ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., its adjuncts and the burial ground and not to the durgah which has been held to be the private property of the defendants." (Emphasis supplied) 114. In Ramji Tripathi (supra), this Court while holding that a suit for the vindication of personal or individual rights was not maintainable, observed that: i. First, the facts and particulars as regards the defect in the machinery for administration which plagued the trust and which required rectification, must be specifically pleaded. A bald and standalone prayer that the direction of the court may be necessary would not be enough and would be a mere pretence for the purpose of bringing the suit under Section 92. In simpler words, it must be shown that the directions of the court are 'necessary' in the facts and circumstances of the matter and such a statement must not be made in vacuum without any basis in reason or facts. ii. Secondly, that it is only the allegations in the plaint that need to be looked into in the first instance to determine whether a suit would fall within the contours of Section 92. However, once the evidence is taken, if the court is of the opinion that the alleged breach of trust....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ut, if after evidence is taken, it is found that the breach of trust alleged has not been made out and that the prayer for direction of the court is vague and is not based on any solid foundation in facts or reason but is made only with a view to bring the suit under the section, then a suit purporting to be brought under Section 92 must be dismissed. This was one of the grounds relied on by the High Court for holding that the suit was not maintainable under Section 92." (Emphasis supplied) 115. In Vidyodaya Trust (supra), this Court had explained that in order to constitute a breach of trust, there must be an element of dishonest intention and lack of probity. If a mistaken action has been undertaken but with all bona fides, the same would not amount to a breach of trust. The Court also employed the test of a 'prudent man' to see whether the required standards of care, caution, rectitude and accuracy, without any reckless indifference has been exhibited by the trust and its trustees. In the first instance, the court is required to only look into the allegations in the plaint to see whether a suit under this provision lies. Once the suit commences and after the eviden....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ress' trust, the question remains how the aforesaid allegations are to be considered, particularly in light of the condition vis-à-vis Section 92 CPC presently discussed in this section. As elaborated, the aforesaid allegations would have to be proven to serve a dual purpose i.e., to first, attract the doctrine of 'constructive trust' to be imposed in equity and second, to proceed to prove that there has been a subsequent breach of that constructive trust or at least, that the directions of the court would be necessary for the administration of that constructive trust. To assert that there has been a breach of the constructive trust which was imposed upon an fiduciary who became a constructive trustee by virtue of his/her actions, it must be proven that the funds or property of the society that were allegedly diverted or siphoned by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively were further 'divested' by them for purposes which do not align with the aims and objectives of the appellant Society, similar to that which occurred in Stevens (supra). In other words, the duties which bound the respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively upon being designated as 'constru....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... narrowly or too widely. It must not be narrow for the reason that the word used is "interest" instead of "direct interest". However, it must also be remembered that while no direct interest is required, the interest must denote a present and substantial interest and not a sentimental, remote, fictitious or purely illusory interest. It must be clear and direct. The reason behind the incorporation of this phrase under Section 92 of the CPC again boils down to the object of preventing frivolous and mischievous applications being filed by busy bodies, unconnected members of the public, and persons who do not possess a specific interest in the trust. 120. In T. Varghese George v. Kora K. George reported in (2012) 1 SCC 369, this Court considered the locus standi of the plaintiffs to institute the suit under Section 92 concerning a secular public educational trust. Therein, of the three plaintiffs, one was a member of the Board of Trustees nominated by the founder himself, the second plaintiff was the brother-in-law of the founder who had raised funds for buying lands for the institution and for the construction of its school buildings and the third plaintiff was a parent of a studen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... time and energy into the establishing and running of the appellant Society. 122. While scrutinising whether the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively are persons interested in the trust and whether they are bringing the suit in a representative capacity, it is not just their designation or position which must be given importance to. They might be seen members of a society (former and current), who happen to be agitating a suit against other members, however, due regard must be given to whether they're representing themselves solely as members in seeking certain remedies or if they have also brought the suit in the interest of the public at large, especially the beneficiaries. It must also be seen whether it is a vested interest in the matter which is the pure and sole reason for bringing the suit or if public interest is also brought to the notice of the court. We are not convinced that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively are merely bringing forward some issues pertaining to disputes between members. While they have sought some remedies related to personal grievances and the wrongful dismissal of the respondent no. 1 which could be seen as unduly magnifying an election ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ights. 125. In Mahant Pragdasji Guru Bhagwandasji v. Patel Ishwarlalbhai Narsibhai reported in (1952) 1 SCC 323, this Court had held that the plaintiffs must pray for one or the other of the reliefs that are specifically mentioned under Section 92(1). Therein, the courts had concurrently found, after examining the evidence on record that was adduced by the parties, that the allegations of breach of trust were not made out. The plaintiffs therein, had not sought for any direction from the court for the proper administration of the trust either. Therefore, the very foundation of the suit under Section 92 became wanting and there remained no cause of action for the institution of the suit. In such circumstances, while dismissing the suit, the High Court had, however, recorded a conclusive finding about the existence of a public trust and made a declaration to that effect. This Court was of the view that such a finding was wholly inconsequential and could not be made a part of the decree or the final order in the shape of a declaratory relief for the reason that it cannot fall under those reliefs mentioned under Section 92(1). The relevant observations are thus: "9. [ ... ]....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....C the only reliefs which the plaintiff can claim and the court can grant are those enumerated specifically in the different clauses of the section. A relief praying for a declaration that the properties in suit are trust properties does not come under any of these clauses. When the defendant denies the existence of a trust, a declaration that the trust does exist might be made as ancillary to the main relief claimed under the section if the plaintiff is held entitled to it; but when the case of the plaintiff fails for want of a cause of action, there is no warrant for giving him a declaratory relief under the provision of Section 92CPC. The finding as to the existence of a public trust in such circumstances would be no more than an obiter dictum and cannot constitute the final decision in the suit. 12. The result is that in our opinion the decision of the High Court should stand, but the decree and the concluding portion of the judgment passed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court on appeal shall direct a dismissal of the plaintiff's suit merely without it being made subject to any declaration as to the character of the properties. To this extent the appeal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... it may be construed as "and" conjunctively and in others, it would remain as "or" in the disjunctive sense. Further elaborating on the aforesaid, it was stated that if any "further relief" was asked for in addition to any of the reliefs already mentioned under clauses (a) to (g), then the word "or" must be construed as "and". However, if the relief prayed for is an "other relief" which is not in any way consequential to or in addition of the reliefs already mentioned under clauses (a) to (g), then the word "or" must be construed in the literal sense as an "or". It is in the latter scenario, where an "other relief" is claimed that the relief must be akin to or of the same nature as any of the reliefs enumerated under clauses (a) to (g). The relevant observations are thus: "1. [ ... ]The plaintiffs respondents in this appeal filed by the defendants-appellants by special leave of this Court from the decision of the High Court of Judicature of Punjab and Haryana filed a suit in the year 1963 against Appellant 1 alone (for the sake of brevity described as the appellant hereinafter in this judgment) praying for a decree for permanent injunction against him to restrain him. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to mean relief of the same nature as clauses (a) to (g). It would be noticed that the word used after clause (g) and before clause (h) is "or". It may mean "and" in the context, or remain "or" in the disjunctive sense in a given case. If any further relief is asked for in addition to any of the reliefs mentioned in clauses (a) to (g) as the nature of the case may require, then the word "or" would mean "and". But if the relief asked for is other relief which is not by way of a consequential or additional relief to any of the reliefs in terms of clauses (a) to (g), then the word "or" will mean "or". The other relief however, cannot be of a nature which is not akin to or of the same nature as any of the reliefs mentioned in clauses (a) to (g). According to the plaintiffs case one of the objects of the religious trust was the worship of Granth Sahib and its recital in congregations of the public. In the suit a decree declaring what portion of the trust property should be allocated to the said object could be asked for under clause (e). The plaintiffs could also ask for the settling of a scheme under clause (g) alleging mismanagement of the religious trust on the part of the trustees. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e objects of the trust and to perform his duties as a trustee. It was further held that, upon reading the plaint as a whole, what was claimed was not a declaration of the rights of the plaintiffs in the religious institution in respect of the Granth Sahib, but an enforcement of due performance of the duties of the trustee in relation to a particular object of the trust. Therefore, this solitary "other relief" was akin to those already mentioned under clauses (a) to (g) and was held to fall within the clause (h) and consequentially, under Section 92 of the CPC. 129. It has been sufficiently explained that the special nature of the suit under Section 92 requires it to be filed fundamentally on behalf of the public for the vindication of public rights. In Sugra Bibi v. Hazi Kummu Mia reported in 1968 SCC OnLine SC 99, this Court had placed reliance on the reasoning given by Woodroffe, J., in Budreedas v. Choonilal reported in ILR 33 Cal 789 and the opinion of Leach, C.J. in Tirumalai-Tirupati Devasthanams Committee v. Udiayar Krishnayya Shanbhaga reported in 1943 SCC OnLine Mad 48, to state that, the fact that a suit relates to a public trust of a religious or charitable nature and....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e filed a suit against the trustees for the recovery of moneys which the latter had collected on behalf of the former praying for a decree directing accounts and inquiries. It was held that the right to collect moneys was entirely independent of Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code and no sanction of the Advocate-General was necessary for the institution of the suit. Leach, C.J. who delivered the judgment of the Court observed as follows: "After hearing the arguments of learned Counsel in the present case we can see no reason for disagreeing with anything said in Shanmukham Chetty v. Govinda Chetty [ILR 1938 Mad 39] . On the order hand we find ourselves in full agreement with the opinion of Varadachariar, J. that, in deciding whether a suit falls within Section 92, the Court must go beyond the reliefs and have regard to the capacity in which the plaintiffs are suing and to the purpose for which the suit is brought. The judgment of the Privy Council in Abdur Rahim v. Mahomed Barkat Ali [(1927) ILR 55 Cal 519 (PC)] lends no support for the opinion expressed by the Full Bench in Janki Bai v. Thiruchitrambala Vinayakar [(1935) ILR 58 Mad 988 (FB)] ". 10. Applying th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r, it was opined that taking into account the dominant purpose of the suit in light of the allegations made in the plaint would also aid is assessing the true nature of the suit. Applying the said principle, the suit was ultimately said to not fall within the contours of Section 92 of the CPC since the issue centred around the succession to the headship of a Math and was concerned with the right to the office of a trustee. The Court also observed that if the real purpose in bringing the suit was to vindicate the general right of the public i.e., to have the rightful person appointed to the office, then there was no reason for the plaintiffs to have omitted to implead or at least refer to the other persons who were nominated by the predecessor in his Will, in the plaint. The relevant observations are reproduced hereinbelow: "10. A suit under Section 92 is a suit of a special nature which presupposes the existence of a public Trust of a religious or charitable character. Such a suit can proceed only on the allegation that there was a breach of such trust or that the direction of the court is necessary for the administration of the trust and the plaintiff must pray for one or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ting to be under Section 92, the question whether the suit is to vindicate the personal or individual right of a third person or to assert the right of the public must be decided after taking into account the dominant purpose of the suit in the light of the allegations in the plaint. If, on the allegations in the plaint, it is clear that the purpose of the suit was to vindicate the individual right of Krishnabodhashram to be the Shankaracharya, there is no reason to hold that the suit was brought to uphold the right of the beneficiaries of the Trust, merely because the suit was filed by two or more members of the public after obtaining the sanction of the Advocate-General and claiming one or more of the reliefs specified in the section. There is no reason to think that whenever a suit is brought by two or more persons under Section 92, the suit is to vindicate the right of the public. As we said, it is the object or the purpose of the suit and not the reliefs that should decide whether it is one for vindicating the right of the public or the individual right of the plaintiffs or third persons. 12. The trial court, after reading the allegations in the plaint and after looki....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... under Section 92. -xxx- 19. In the suit against public trusts, if on analysis of the averments contained in the plaint it transpires that the primary object behind the suit was the vindication of individual or personal rights of some persons an action under the provision does not lie. As noted in Swami Paramatmanand case [R.M. Narayana Chettiar v. N. Lakshmanan Chettiar, (1991) 1 SCC 48] a suit under Section 92 CPC is a suit of special nature, which presupposes the existence of a public trust of religious or charitable character. When the plaintiffs do not sue to vindicate the right of the public but seek a declaration of their individual or personal rights or the individual or personal rights of any other persons or persons in whom they are interested, Section 92 has no application. -xxx- 23. One of the factual aspects which needs to be highlighted is that the allegations which have been made against Respondents 2, 3 and 10 are referable to a decision taken by the Board, though may be by majority. The fundamental question that arises is whether allegations against three of them would be sufficient to taint the Board's decision. As was obser....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....de in a suit of this nature, especially when such grievances can be redressed through other mechanisms or under a regular suit not falling within Section 92. Such issues must not be deviously magnified or amplified as if there is a breach of trust warranting intervention under this provision. 134. However, the fact that certain private rights are being agitated must not be reason enough to ignore the other allegations made in the suit regarding the functioning of the appellant Society and dismiss the suit outrightly, provided the suit is instituted in a representative capacity. It would always be open for the High Court, during the course of the suit proceedings, to grant not all but only some of the reliefs claimed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively, for the reason that the others are clearly beyond the scope of what is contemplated under Section 92 of the CPC. The reliefs in the present plaint, insofar as they agitate private rights, cannot be granted under a suit of this nature. 135. Additionally, as opined in Charan Singh (supra), when there exist some reliefs which clearly fall under clauses (a) to (g), the other prayers must be seen as constituting "further rel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the plaint fall outside the scope of Section 92(1) and some i.e., prayers (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint fall within the scope of Section 92(1). A reading of the contents of the plaint reveal several averments regarding the circumstances which led to the dismissal of the respondent no. 1 as also circumstances and events indicating the questionable conduct on part of respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively in their capacity as fiduciaries. Therefore, the allegations in the plaint by themselves are also not clearly indicative of a single object/purpose for which the suit has been instituted i.e., whether it has been instituted by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 for the vindication of public rights in a representative capacity or for the purpose of canvassing personal grievances alone. No doubt, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively may also have a personal axe to grind with the appellant Society and also respondent nos. 3 and 4 respectively, however, insofar as the background in which prayers (c), (d) and (e) have been made, it cannot be said with certainty that these prayers are also made with an absence of bona fides and a with vested interests. It cannot be said that the appellant S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n reliefs are sought can in fact be considered to be a 'trust' or a 'constructive trust'. v. When no formal recognition has been given to the institution, the creation of a public trust can be inferred from the relevant circumstances surrounding the coming into existence of and functioning of the institution/entity in question. Although it is not possible to provide an exhaustive list of the same, yet they may include - (a) the method of devolution of the property to the institution or its acquisition and the circumstances along with the intention behind the grant of property i.e. whether it was for the benefit of the organization/public beneficiaries or for the personal benefit of any particular individual/family; (b) whether the grant is accompanied with any fetter/obligation or qualified with a condition, either express or implied, regarding its use by the grantee; (c) whether the 'dedication' was complete i.e., whether there was an absolute cessation or complete relinquishment of ownership of the property on the part of the grantor and a subsequent vesting of the property in another individual (trustee) for the said object; (d) whether the publi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... registration of a society if the broad circumstances enumerated under point (v) are met. In such a case, all the properties of the society which had been imbued with the character of 'trust property' would be subject to Section 92. However, if it is argued that a trust has instead separately been created for holding the property of the society after its registration as a society, the same must be clearly and sufficiently proven. Here, the separate trust which has been created and the properties which has been vested in said trust would be subject to scrutiny under Section 92. In both these scenarios, an 'express trust' would be created and in a suit under Section 92 CPC, the first criteria i.e., the existence of an express or constructive trust, would be met. x. In the absence of such a separate vesting in trustees as aforesaid, the property belonging to the society would be automatically vested, through a deeming fiction, in the governing body of the society. Such a governing body is duty bound to ensure that the property is put towards and utilised for the purposes/aims of the society as laid out in its Memorandum of Association or any Rules and Regulati....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....#39; although similar in nomenclature, bears a doctrinal difference, the former is remedial while the latter is institutional. In other words, in implying the existence of a constructive trust, the English Courts recognise or give legal efficacy to a fiduciary/confidential relationship or 'institution' that already exists. It would arise, by operation of law, but when one person is under an existent obligation to hold a certain property for another. This constructive trust would come into existence from the date of the circumstances which give rise to it and the function of the court would only be to declare that such a trust has arisen in the past. xiv. What must, however, be noted is that, for this equitable doctrine to be applied, the fiduciary must receive property or money which he cannot conscientiously retain. It is only thereafter that a constructive trust would be raised in favour of the beneficiaries on whose account the money was originally received. To put it simply, the factum that the fiduciary 'withheld' the property from its rightful beneficiaries must be established. That such a fiduciary sought to misapply the property in contravention to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... other allegations in the plaint which cannot simply be ignored and which give the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively, a dual role/capacity, whilst they're agitating the matter under Section 92 of the CPC. The larger background in which the suit is brought alludes to the existence of public interest also at play. xviii. The reliefs claimed by the plaintiffs, must fall within those reliefs outlined under Section 92(1). As regards the question when a relief can be considered to fall under the residual clause (h) providing for "further or other relief" under Section 92(1), this Court in Charan Singh (supra) elaborated that if the relief prayed for is not a "further relief" but an "other relief" which is not in any way consequential to or in addition of the certain other reliefs already mentioned under clauses (a) to (g) and prayed for, then the "other relief" must be akin to or of the same nature as any of the reliefs enumerated under clauses (a) to (g). xix. Furthermore, the special nature of the suit under Section 92 requires it to be filed fundamentally on behalf of the public for the vindication of public rights. Therefore, courts must go beyond the reliefs....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI