Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

CoC approval of sale to related entities upheld as commercially rational; Regulation 29 not a bar, Regulation 36A(1A) inapplicable

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NCLAT set aside the impugned Adjudicating Authority order and upheld the Committee of Creditors' approval of the sale of certain non-core, encumbered assets of the corporate debtor, holding that the CoC's decision to effect an outright transfer to related entities was a commercially rational choice within the exclusive domain of the CoC and thus non-justiciable except for compliance with the Code. The Tribunal held Regulation 29 does not prohibit a CoC-sanctioned sale where the secured creditors (who were CoC members) consented, and that Regulation 36A(1A) is inapplicable as it post-dates the CoC approval. Directions compelling separate RPs to invite independent bids exceeded the Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction. Appeal disposed; sale permitted.....