Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (11) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....W. P. No. 42688 of 2025 and 47752 & 47753 of 2025 - -<br>GST<br>Honourable Mr. Justice C. Saravanan For the Petitioner : Mr. A. Chandrasekaran in all cases For the Respondents : Mr. C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader in all cases COMMON ORDER In these writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders as detailed below: S. No W.P.Nos. A.Y Date of show c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ailed to respond to the same, the impugned assessments have been passed. The details of the petitioner's discharged tax liability are given below. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said amounts have already been paid, as there was a departmental dispute. It is further submitted that no case has been made out for invoking the extended period of limitation under Section 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....est the tax liability and that the dispute is confined only to the interest and penalty, for which the petitioner seeks to work out an appropriate remedy, if any, under Section 128-A of the respective GST Act. 7. The learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the respondent will consider the matter under Section 128-A of the respective GST Enactment, though the proceedings were orig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ought to have been initiated under Section 73 of the respective GST Act, by exercising powers under Section 75(2). The said exercise shall be completed by the respondent within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner filing a detailed reply to the notice and treating the impugned order as a show cause notice within a period of thirt....