2019 (8) TMI 1940
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t Jain, Advocate i/b R.V. Legal for the Appellant. Mr. Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate with Ms. Rashi Dalmia, Advocate i/b The Law Point for the Respondent. Per : Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member (Oral) 1. By an order dated June 28, 2018 the Adjudicating Officer ('AO' for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI' for short) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 3 lakh on the appellant under Section ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aded Price (LTP). Following issue of a show cause notice dated February 20, 2017 and after providing an opportunity of personal hearing, filing replies etc. the impugned order has been issued. 3. Shri Akshit Jain, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant incurred loss; one Shri Chetan Dogra was instrumental in making the appellant trade; the contribution to the New High Pric....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d. 4. We also heard Shri Anubhav Ghosh, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the respondent and perused the documents before us. The impugned order as well the show cause notice quite clearly articulate the position relating to the nature of appellant's trades and how the same has violated the provisions of the PFUTP Regulations. We note from the impugned order that apart from substantial ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the appellant that his reply was not considered is also incorrect, since para 11 of the impugned order and specifically in sub-para 11(g) the gist of the appellant's contention has been captured. In a case of analyzing market manipulation together by a number of entities each individual's role may not be explained in great detail because it is the group behavior as a whole that becomes more releva....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI