Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e matter is heard finally. 2. By this petition, petitioners Impugned orders dated 5-10-2005 and dated 5-12-2005 passed by respondent No. 2-Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( for short "Tribunal"). The Tribunal directed the petitioner to pre-deposit Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five lakhs) within a period of eight weeks and report compliance thereof on 5-12-2005 as condition precede....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitioners submitted their explanations to the notices served on them. They urged that the demand was not proper and correct. The respondent No. 3 assessed them for tax liability and directed them to pay excise duty of Rs. 1,00,32,600/- (Rs. One crore thirty two thousand six hundred). They preferred separate appeals against the order of respondent No. 3 in respect of the demand for excise duty. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the parties and have gone through both the impugned orders. It is pertinent to note that the Tribunal has observed that prima facie the duty demand of Rs. 54,45,358/- (Rs. Fifty Four Lakhs Forty Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Eight) on account of clearance by misdeciaring the goods as supply of software design charges could be recovered from the petitioners. It is for such reason that pre-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....account, the direction was issued regarding pre-deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Lakhs). There is no discussion regarding particulars of plea raised by the appellants in this behalf, consideration thereof by the Tribunal and application of judicial mind to such a submission. The petitioners have relied upon tax audit report and have inter alia contended that the Textile Unit is running ....