Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (11) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....RDER PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : These appeals at the instance of assessee are directed against the separate order of Ld. CIT(A) NFAC, Delhi passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 evenly dated 28.08.2024 which are arising out of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 13.09.2022 and order levying penalty u/s 270A of the Act dated 20.03.2023 respectively. 2. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dication. 3. At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed both the appeals in limine by not condoning the delay in filing of the appeal. He referred to various reasons giving rise to the delay in filing of appeal before Ld. CIT(A) order and prayed that delay in filing appeal before Ld. CIT(A) is not intentional and may please be condoned and issues raised i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2022 but assessee did not responded to the notices. Ld. A.O. framed the assessment order on 13.09.2022 denying deduction u/s 80P of the Act and assessed the income at Rs. 25,86,505/- Ld. AO also initiated penalty proceeding u/s 270A of the Act and levied penalty of Rs. 9,01,367/- I further observe that the assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) against both quantum addition and penalty but wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by plethora of decisions of this Tribunal. Reliance placed on the decision in the case of Annapurna Nagari Sahkari Pathsanstha Maryadit Yawal Vs. ITO, Ward-1 (4), Jalgaon, 2025 (6) TMI 963, dated 07.05.2025 (ITA No. 313/PUN/2025) 5. I find that the issue is no longer res-integra as this Tribunal has strongly taken a view that since Co-operative Banks are basically Co-operative Societies, there....