Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

The comparison between Unjust Enrichment under Indian Customs Law (Customs Act, 1962) and under GST Law (CGST Act, 2017).

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he comparison between Unjust Enrichment under Indian Customs Law (Customs Act, 1962) and under GST Law (CGST Act, 2017).<br>By: - YAGAY andSUN<br>Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Dated:- 1-11-2025<br>Both frameworks share the same equitable foundation - preventing anyone from receiving a refund if they have already passed the tax burden to another (usually the consumer). But they differ slightly in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... scope, procedure, and exceptions. Unjust Enrichment under Customs Law vs. GST Law (India) Aspect Customs Act, 1962 CGST Act, 2017 Relevant Section Section 27(2) Section 54(8) & (9) Core Principle Refund only if incidence of duty not passed on to another person. Refund only if incidence of tax not passed on to another person. Who Can Claim Importer/exporter or person who paid the duty.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Registered person or applicant who paid GST. Burden of Proof On the claimant to prove that duty incidence not passed on. On the claimant to prove tax incidence not passed on. Evidence Required CA certificate, invoices, balance sheet entries, etc. CA/CMA certificate, credit/debit notes, accounting records, etc. Refund Process Verified by Customs authorities; unjust enrichment check mandat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ory. Verified by GST officer; unjust enrichment check mandatory before sanction. If Burden Passed On Refund amount credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund under Sec. 27(2) & 12C. Refund amount credited to Consumer Welfare Fund under Sec. 57 of CGST Act. Exceptions (Refund Payable to Applicant) Certain cases excluded, e.g., refund of duty on exports or provisional assessment adjustments. Speci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fic cases excluded under Section 54(8), e.g.:* Refund of tax on exports (zero-rated supplies)* Refund of unutilized ITC* Refund of tax paid on supplies not made* Refund of tax borne by applicant (not passed on). Judicial Precedents Mafatlal Industries, Solar Pesticides, Allied Photographics VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2021) - emphasized legislative intent to prevent unjust ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enrichment, even in refund of ITC. Consumer Welfare Fund Established under Central Excise Act, applied to Customs via Section 27A. Established under Section 57 of CGST Act for welfare of consumers. Underlying Principle Preventing the importer/exporter from gaining undue benefit from excess duty refund. Preventing taxpayers from getting refunds where the ultimate consumer has already borne th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e GST. Key Points of Comparison 1. Common Objective Both laws aim to prevent double benefit - ensuring that the economic burden and legal incidence of tax/duty are not separated unfairly. In simpler terms: Refunds are only allowed when the taxpayer truly bore the burden. 2. Procedural Difference * Under Customs, refunds typically arise from import/export duty assessments (e.g., wrong class....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ification, exemption errors). * Under GST, refunds can arise from multiple situations - exports, inverted duty structure, excess payments, etc. 3. Presumption of Passing On Both laws presume that the burden has been passed on, unless proven otherwise. This is a rebuttable presumption, meaning the claimant must provide convincing evidence to show otherwise. 4. Exceptions to Unjust Enrichment ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Refund Directly Payable) Under Customs (Sec. 27(2)): Refund payable to claimant if: * Duty was paid under provisional assessment and adjustment shows excess. * Duty was paid but goods were not cleared or exported. * Refund relates to import by government or its agencies. Under GST (Sec. 54(8)): Refund payable to claimant if: * Refund is of tax paid on zero-rated supplies (exports/SEZ)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... * Refund is of unutilized ITC. * Refund of tax paid on supplies not made. * Refund of tax borne by applicant (and not passed on). 5. Judicial Standpoint Law Judicial Emphasis Customs Law Supreme Court in Mafatlal Industries ? All refunds, whether based on constitutional grounds or otherwise, must pass the unjust enrichment test. GST Law Supreme Court in VKC Footsteps (2021) ? Legisl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ature intentionally restricted refund categories to prevent unjust enrichment and protect revenue. 6. Consumer Welfare Fund as Safeguard Both regimes divert refund amounts (when unjust enrichment applies) to the Consumer Welfare Fund, symbolizing that any excess collected should benefit the public, not the claimant. Summary Table Feature Customs Act, 1962 CGST Act, 2017 Refund Section Sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion 27 Section 54 Unjust Enrichment Clause Section 27(2) Section 54(8) & (9) Presumption Refund normally implies unjust enrichment unless rebutted Same presumption applies Fund for Denied Refunds Consumer Welfare Fund Consumer Welfare Fund Proof Requirement On claimant On claimant Key Cases Mafatlal, Solar Pesticides VKC Footsteps Exceptions Limited Broader (exports, ITC, etc.)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... In essence: Both under Customs and GST, the principle of unjust enrichment ensures that refunds go only to those who have truly borne the burden of tax or duty - and not to those who have already shifted it to someone else. ***<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....