TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (8) TMI 1642
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), and also the underlying prior notice and order under Section 148A(b) and Section 148A(d) of the Act, respectively. The reassessment under Section 148 of the Act has been initiated in respect of returns filed by the Petitioner-Assessee for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 3. On perusal of the record, it is apparent that the impugned notice dated 27 May, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b), the order passed thereon under Section 148A(d) dated 29 July, 2022 and the consequent notice dated 29 July, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act are all issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ("JAO") and not by a Faceless Assessing Officer ("FAO"), as is required by the provisions of Section 151A of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e JAO and vice versa, which is clearly not contemplated in the Act. Therefore, there is no question of concurrent jurisdiction of both FAO or the JAO with respect to the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. The Scheme dated 29th March 2022 in paragraph 3 clearly provides that the issuance of notice "shall be through automated allocation " which means that the same is mandatory and is required to be followed by the Department and does not give any discretion to the Department to choose whether to follow it or not. That automated allocation is defined in paragraph 2(b) of the Scheme to mean an algorithm for randomised allocation of cases by using suitable technological tools including artificial intelligence and machine learning w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion 148 of the Act and not the JAO. The argument advanced by respondent would render clause 3(b) of the Scheme otiose and to be ignored or contravened, as according to respondent, even though the Scheme specifically provides for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act in a faceless manner, no notice is required to be issued under Section 148 of the Act in a faceless manner. In such a situation, not only clause 3(b) but also the first two lines below clause 3(b) would be otiose, as it deals with the aspect of issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. Respondents, being an authority subordinate to the CBDT, cannot argue that the Scheme framed by the CBDT, and which has been laid before both House of Parliament is partly otiose ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....arned Counsel for both the parties agree that the proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act would not be sustainable in view of the judgment rendered in Hexaware. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner-Assessee has also drawn our attention to a recent decision of this Court in Nainraj Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 4(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors. [Writ Petition (L.) No. 16918 of 2024 dt. 2-07-2024], whereby in similar circumstances, this Court has allowed the petition considering the provisions of Section 151A of the Act. 7. Apart from the petitioner's contention that the proceedings would stand covered by the decision of this Court in Hexaware Technologies Limited (supra), another contention as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d section 148A is the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or where there is no Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General, the Chief Commissioner or Director General if more than three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. The present petition relates to the AY 2016-17, and as the impugned order and impugned notice are issued beyond the period of three years which elapsed on 31st March, 2020 the approval as contemplated in section 151(ii) of the Act would have to be obtained which has not been done by the Assessing Officer. The impugned notice mentions that the prior approval has been taken of the 'Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - 8' ('PCIT-8') which is bad in law as th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nce the Finance Act, 2021 is in existence. The sanction of the specified authority has to be obtained in accordance with the law existing when the sanction is obtained and, therefore, the sanction is required to be obtained by applying the amended section 151(ii) of the Act and since the sanction has been obtained in terms of section 151(i) of the Act, the impugned order and impugned notice are bad in law and should be quashed and set aside." 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn our attention to the decision of this Court in Kairos Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 22686 of 2024 dated 05.08.2024] where the Court considered the effect of scheme as notified by....