Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 1282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mported vide bill of entry no. 4570688/07.09.2011 and no. 5956535/09.02.2012, and two consignments imported vide bill of entry no. 883363/22.08.2007 and no. 883362/22.08.2007 - the duty liability thereon are in dispute. 2. On the first consignment, valued at Rs. 7,72,12,898.29, differential duty of Rs. 46,31,909 was sought to be fastened, while in the second consignment, valued at Rs. 9,91,10,587 differential duty of Rs. 58,55,480 and on the third, differential duty of Rs. 18,65,702 were ordered to be recovered under section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962 even as the goods covered by the first two sets of imports were held as liable for confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem the former on payment of fine....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ds as articles that are neither 'unwrought titanium' nor 'wrought titanium'. 6. It is admitted in the impugned order that 'wrought' has not been assigned meaning as far as heading 8108 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is concerned and, instead, resort was had to the distinction drawn for 'tungsten' in tariff heading 8101 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The finding in consequence was that '49. The definition of 'Wrought' has not been clarified under CTH 8108, however the same has been explained under heading 8101 in respect of Tungsten (wolfram) which is as follows: i) Unwrought metal, e.g., in blocks, ingots, sintered bars and rods, or as waste and scrap (for the latter see the Explan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ake to classify Titanium Tubes/Pipes under CTH 8108 9010 as wrought. It is clear that the modus operandi of the importer was that wherever the quantity of the imported goods i.e Titanium Tubes/Pipes was small, they have classified them under CTH 8108 90 90 however wherever the quantity of the imported goods was huge, the importer has intentionally classified the similar goods i.e Titanium Tubes/Pipes under different tariff heading 8108 90 10 to evade payment of legitimate duty of Customs.' to conclude the goods as being not 'wrought titanium' and, therefore, by default in the residual category. 7. The rules for engagement of classification places the onus solely on customs authorities in terms of decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court....