Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 1292

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act"), dated 29.03.2016 for AY 2013-14. 2. Grounds taken by the assessee are reproduced as under: "(i) The CIT(A) of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) has erred in confirming the order of Assessing Officer. (ii) The CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) has erred in upholding the decision of the Assessing Officer, thereby confirming the denial of the benefit under Section 54F. (iii) The CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 64,36,629/- made by the Assessing Officer. (iv) The CIT(A) has erred in creating demand of Rs. 18,04,130/- (v) The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, and modify aforesaid ground/s of Appeal at or any time before the hearing as they may be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... hence made the addition by disallowing the same. In first appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the said disallowance. Aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. Before us, ld. Counsel for the assessee placed a paper book containing the 23 pages to substantiate the claim of deduction. He referred to the allotment letter dated 11.06.2012 issued by the builder M/s. G.K. Relators whereby the aforesaid flat was allotted to the assessee for the value of Rs. 76,65,000/- and the said allotment letter mentions that agreement of sale and other formalities will be taken up in due course. For the purpose of obtaining this allotment letter, assessee had made a part payment of Rs. 15 lacs by cheque no. 000014 on 05.06.2012 against which the bui....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red in the name of the assessee. It is sufficient, if the amount has been invested by the assessee in a house property against the booking of a flat in a housing project which is proposed for construction. 5.1. It is contented that section 54F is a beneficial provision for promoting construction of residential house and hence is to be construed liberally to achieve the object of the said section. The said section does not prescribe the completion of construction or purchase of residential house, but the thrust is on making of investment of the net consideration received on sale of original asset in the construction/purchase of the new residential house. What is important is that assessee has parted with the sale consideration of original....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1). Allotment letter is issued by the builder year earmarking Flat No. 2102 on 21st floor of the proposed building for which eventually a registered agreement was executed and the possession was handed over to the assessee after obtaining occupancy certificate. Thus assessee had in fact acquired a house property which is not in dispute. Ld. AO has based his decision to disallow on the registered agreement which falls beyond the period of 2 years for making an investment. Assessee claims that she has made the required investment of the sale consideration received by her in a residential house for which allotment letter issued by the builder earmarking the flat, is on record. 7.1. On this factual matrix, what we have to see is whether the ....