Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 1176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....With Mr Shivam Pandey For Mr Chetan K Pandya (1973).   For the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3: Mr Abhishek Jain Assistant Government Pleader.   ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) Heard learned advocate Mr. Yogesh Patki through video conference with learned advocate Mr. Shivam Pandey for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Abhishek Jai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3.1. According to the petitioners, the order dated 01.08.2024 was not uploaded on the portal and, therefore, the petitioners were not aware of the order. The petitioner received an E-mail dated 13.11.2024 along with the order dated 01.08.2024. 4. The petitioners being aggrieved by the order dated 01.08.2024, preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority on 08.01.2025. However, th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hin the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 107(4) of the GST Act. 6. It was, therefore, submitted that the order passed by the first appellate authority is required to be quashed and set aside as the appeal filed by the petitioners was within the prescribed period of limitation and the first appellate authority may be directed to hear the appeal on merits. 7. On the other hand,....