Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (7) TMI 1708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....w as well as of facts in upholding the addition of Rs. 30,28,729/- made by the Assessing Officer treating salary paid to trustees to be unreasonable applying the provisions of Section 13(l)(c) r.w 13(3) of the Act thereby restricting the denial of exemption to the amount that is held unreasonable which is arbitrary and unjustified. 2. That the submissions of the assessee justifying the payment of salary to the trustees has not been appreciated in the correct perspective and as such the order upheld is arbitrary and unjustified. 3. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has erred on facts in not quantifying as to what is a reasonable amount of salary that ought to be allowable and a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 23,40,000/- 30,28,729/- 27,73,450/- The Assessing officer while making the disallowance did not prove that the services were not provided by the management employees. Therefore the salaries paid to the management persons are good in eyes of law and facts and should be allowed to the assessee. 4. During the proceedings before us, the ld. Counsel for the Assessee has filed the written submissions which is as under: - "7.2 The submission of the AR in this regard is as follows: The Assessing officer while making this disallowance did not consider the following facts :- The Assessing officer while making the disallowance did not consider the fact that the salaries to these persons are being paid every year ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... RAJNI KATARIA TREASURER M.A ECONOMICS MORE THAN 15 YEARS The Assessing officer while making the disallowance did not prove that the services were not provided by the management employees. Therefore the salaries paid to the management persons are good in eyes of law and facts and should be allowed to the assessee. 5. The ld. CIT (A) in his order has given findings on this issue which is reproduced as under:- "7.3 The submissions of the assessee have been considered. The AO has made disallowance of salaries of Rs. 30,28,729/- paid to trustees by holding the salaries paid to be exorbitant (29.43% more than the last year). The counsel in contention stated that the trustees were full time occupied in runnin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has rightly held the salaries paid to trustees as unreasonable and a way of granting undue benefits to persons covered u/s 13 of the Act. It was and would be rational to treat the entire payment of salaries as unreasonable. The assessee would not get any additional benefit due to section 13(2). In that light, the AO is directed to restrict the denial of exemption to the amount that has been held unreasonable. Accordingly, the ground of appeal is dismissed." 6. The ld. DR relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. During the proceedings before us, the ld. counsel of the Assessee submitted that it is not the only year where salary has been paid to trustee. In fact, he brought it on record that in the immediately preceding year as well as in ....