Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 953

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"] dated 11.10.2021. 2. Facts of the Case 2.1 The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2020-21 on 29.09.2020, declaring total income of Rs. 1,13,55,020/-. In the return of income, the assessee had opted for taxation under section 115BAA at the concessional rate of 22%, which was duly reflected in Part A-GEN of ITR-6. The return was processed by the CPC, Bengaluru, under section 143(1) on 11.10.2021. 2.2 While processing the return, the CPC made the following adjustments: Particular As per Return (Rs.) As per 143(1) (Rs.) Difference/Remarks Total Income 1,13,55,020 1,17,95,917 Disallowance u/s 43B of Rs. 4,40,894/- Tax Rate Appl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he CIT(A) dismissed the appeal. 2.6 Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us raising following grounds: 1. The Honourable Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred on facts and in law in not giving benefit of taxation at the rate of 22% under section 115BAA. 2. The Honourable Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not considering the fact that the assessee has opted for taxation under section 115BAA in the Income Tax Return. 3. On facts tax ought to have been calculated at the rate of 22% and the tax as calculated by the appellant in the income tax return ought to have been accepted. 4. The Honourable Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not giv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted 11.09.2025, has condoned the delay under section 119(2)(b) and granted permission to file Form No. 10-IC for A.Y. 2020-21. The relevant finding from the PCIT's order reads as under: "Considering the above facts and the report of the AO, the application of the assessee for condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for filing Form No. 10-IC for A.Y. 2020-21 is hereby granted." 4.1 The effect of such condonation is that the assessee's option under section 115BAA stands validly exercised. The denial of concessional rate at 22% under section 115BAA, which formed the sole ground of dispute in the appeal, thus no longer survives. 4.2 In view of the foregoing discussion, and considering that the delay in ....