Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (8) TMI 1050

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ORDER BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the revenue in respect of the assessment year 1991-92 and is directed against the order dated 15.02.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 4787/Del/2003. The impugned order is a composite order in respect of the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94. Separate appeals have been filed in respect of e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the assessee was a professional cricketer and he did not disclose this fact before the Assessing Officer and consequently, the re-assessment proceedings would be valid in as much as, the case would squarely fall within the proviso to Section 147 of the said Act. 4. On the other hand, it is contended on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent that the assessee had fully and truly d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome was claimed as exempt. From the assessment order dated 28.08.1992 it is apparent that the circular was considered in detail. In fact, after construing the said circular, the Assessing Officer added back an amount of Rs 3,600/- per match in respect of test matches in India after construing the terms of the circular. It cannot, therefore, be said that the assessment order was completed without t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions under the circular and added back the said sum of Rs. 3,600/- per match for test matches in India, based upon the circular, clearly implies that the Assessing Officer had considered the assessee to be a ameteur cricketer. He submitted that it is only in the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1994-95 that the Assessing Officer took a different view and held the assessee to be a pro....