2025 (10) TMI 643
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....venue : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR ORDER PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM: 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi ["Ld. CIT(A)", for short] dated 27.09.2024 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee pressed the Ground No.1 which read as u....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ct, the same was required to be approved by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or where there is no such authority, by Chief Commissioner or Director General. He submitted that in the case of the assessee, it is apparent that the said notice u/s 148 was not issued with the prior approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner or any other authority specified u/s 151(ii) of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ced on record. We observed that the Notice dated 29.07.2022 issued u/s 148 of the Act is not a valid notice, as the approval was not granted by the specified authority i.e. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as mandated u/s 151(ii) We further observe that the impugned notice u/s 148 for AY 2017-18 was issued on 29.07.2022, after obtaining the approval Pr.CIT, Delhi i.e. beyond the period o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 29.07.2022 passed under section 148A(d) of the Act is not sustainable. Consequently, the subsequent proceedings, including the assessment order dated 23.05.2023, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the impugned order passed under section 148A(d) of the Act, the notice issued under section 13\48 of the Act as well as the assessment order dated 23.05.2023 and the demand raised pursuant thereto, are h....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI