2025 (10) TMI 582
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, both dated 28.02.2023 for the assessment years 2012-2013 & 2013-2014. 2. Shri Devesh Poddar, ld. AR appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr.DR appeared on behalf of the revenue. 3. It was submitted by the ld AR that the assessee along with his four brother....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... not done by the DVO but by the AO himself, who is not competent person to make such estimation. It was the submission that the AO in his assessment order in page 3 also records that the properties is an ancestral property. He also records that being ancestral property, the investment should have been made in the return of HUF. It was found that the HUF has not filed any return, insofar as the HUF....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssued to the brothers of the assessee. It is also accepted that the brothers of the assessee have responded saying that they have also invested in the property for renovation. This being so, admittedly, the investment, if any, in the house property would have been considered in all the four hands and not that of the assessee alone. On this ground alone, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI