Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order framed by the ld. AO u/s 14(3)/144/254 of the Act vide order dated 18.03.2015. 03. The facts in brief are that this being the second round before the Tribunal. In the first found vide order dated 23.05.2013, the coordinate Bench has restored the issue to the file of the ld. AO in assessee's cross appeals in ITA No. 432/KOL/2012 filed and the Revenue's appeals in ITA No. 328/KOL/2012 and directed the AO to re-adjudicate the same as the assessee has given reasonable explanation with regard to non-representation of his case before the ld. AO. Accordingly, the assessment order was framed by the ld. AO u/s 14(3)/144/254 of the Act vide order dated 18.03.2015 by stating the assessment year as 2012-13 and financial year as 2011-12 there ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The ld. DR on the other hand submitted that this was merely a mistake on the part of the AO while issuing the notices in the set aside proceedings to the assessee and also the same mistake occurred in the assessment order, penalty notice and demand notice issued, which were corrected by bringing a corrigendum dated 25.03.2015 and therefore, would not lead the invalidation of assessment itself. The ld. DR submitted that the assessee participated in the assessment proceeding before the ld. CIT (A) and has never raised this issue. Therefore, the issue raised by the assessee may kindly be dismissed. 06. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that this is the second round of litigation bef....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 18.03.2015 the assessment year was inadvertently written as '2012-13' instead of assessment year '2008'09. In all the above mentioned order and notices the assessment year should be read as '2008-09' instead of assessment year '2012-13' and the previous year should be read as '2007-08' instead of previous year '2011-12'. This Corrigendum order should be a part of the assessment order passed under section 144/254/143(3) of the Income Tax Act dated 18.03.2015 and of the demand notice and the penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) in the case of the abovementioned assessee for the assessment year 2008-09." 07. On perusal of the above corrigendum, it is revealed that there was total non-application of mind and ....