TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (10) TMI 107
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act 2013, having registered with the respondent department vide GSTN-37AAECN3984D1ZB. The petitioner inter alia engaged in management of educational institutions, educational consultancy besides providing the same, also engaged in providing hostel accommodation services to students of various educational institutions. 3. In the process of its business, the petitioner had taken residential dwellings on rent from the respective landlords so as to provide accommodation to the students. As the landlords had been charged tax on the invoices issued by them, the petitioner has been paying tax on the renting of residential dwelling services. It is the case of the petitioner that the serv....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of CGST Rules, 2017. He would further contend that in the absence of following the procedure under the said Rule, the impugned memos under challenge are liable to be interdicted by this Court. 5. A counter affidavit is filed by the respondents contending that as per Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019 issued by CBIC once a deficiency memo has been issued, the refund application would not be further processed. It is further contended that as per Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017, an application claiming refund of any tax and interest has to be made within a period of two (02) years from the relevant date in such form and manner as may be prescribed. He would further contend that as per Notification No.13/2022-Central Taxes, dated 05....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iciency memos, informed the petitioner that the refund applications are not fit for processing as the stipulated time of two (02) years time period for submission of the said applications is already completed. 8. In this connection it is pertinent to note that as per Entry No. 12 of Exemption Notification No. 12 by 2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017, services by way of renting of residential dwellings for use as residents is exempted, nevertheless the petitioner paid taxes inasmuch as invoices raised by the landlords included the GST component. It is needless to point that any collection of tax shall be in accordance with Article 265 of the Constitution of India which postulates that no tax can be collected without authority of la....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....take; or (d) *** 8. This Court, in the case of Binani Cement Ltd. V. Union of India, (2013) 288 ELT 193 (Guj), held that where the duty is collected without any authority of law, such collection of duty is considered as collected without authority of law and, therefore, is opposed to Article 265 of the Constitution of India and, thus, unconstitutional. It is held that the assessee is not bound by the limitation prescribed under the special law for claiming the refund of the excess duty or duty collected illegality. The period of limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act would apply. The relevant abstract of the decision at paragraphs nos. 23 and 25 are as under: "xxxxx......" 11. The issue is squarel....