Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (4) TMI 74

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stoms, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "CEGAT"). 2.Briefly stated the facts are as follows : The Appellants are manufacturers of bodies of Buses. During inspection by the Officers of the Respondent, it was noticed that the Appellants were also manufacturing Aluminium Paint and applying it on the bodies of the Buses. In respect of this Aluminium Paint the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....separate and distinct product with a distinct identity comes into existence. It is a Paint which is known in the market as "Aluminium Paint". We see no substance in the submission that it is not marketable because it has a very short shelf life. As per the statement given by the Manager and the Managing Director of the Appellants' Company the product has a shelf life of 8 to 10 hours. This is enou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....facture, the answer was that he could not say. 5.On the above facts both the authorities below were right in holding that a distinct product had come into existence and that it was a marketable. 6.It was next urged that the extended period of limitation could not have been invoked. We find no substance in the submission. It is clear that the Appellants had not disclosed to the Department that t....