Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (9) TMI 1388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Ashish Kumar Shekhar, A.C. to Sr. S.C. ORDER TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.(ORAL) 1. The instant writ petition has filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for declaring Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Annexure-4) as ultra vires, in as much as it seeks to impose a time limit for the availment of Input Tax Credit being violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and also being violative of the basic structure of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. (ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction for declaring the am....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that in view of the provision of Section 118 of the Finance Act, 2024, the matter needs to be decided afresh and as such, the impugned Order-in-Original and Summary of Order may be quashed and set aside so that matter be decided, on remand, afresh. 3. Learned counsel for respondents Mr. Amit Kumar, on instructions, has submitted that in view of the provision as inserted in the Finance Act, 2024 as under Section 118 thereof, the matter needs to be adjudicated afresh. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have considered the demand raised on account of the violation of Section 16(4) of the JGST Act as would be evident from paragraph-5 of the impugned order. 5. It is evident that the Gazette Notification has been i....