Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (8) TMI 1260

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ependently without prejudice to one another; 1. Disallowance us/14A. 1.01) On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming disallowance of Rs 11,54,860/- vide Rule 8D(2) by invoking provisions of section 14A of the Act without appreciating that all the expenses debited to the profit and loss account are incurred for the purpose of the business income and allowable as business expense. Thus the disallowance being bad-in-law needs to be deleted. 1.02) Without prejudice to the above and without admitting, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the resort cannot be made to Rule 8D(2) since the learned AO has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1098130/- 5 Allocable Expenses 56729/- 6 Total Disallowance (4+5) 1154860/- 3.Aggrieved by the order of the AO, assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority(FAA).It was argued before him that AO had not mentioned the defects with the calculation made by the assessee, that he should have rejected the claim of the assessee before applying the provisions of Rule 8D, that Nil/negligence expenditure was incurred for earning dividend income, that borrowed funds were not utilised by the assessee. After considering the facts of the case and submission of the assessee, FAA held that AO had made no disallowance on account of interest expenditure, that only disallowance was on account of administrative exp....