2025 (5) TMI 2185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Chandigarh dated 12.02.2024 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the business of Builders and Developers. The Return of Income for the A.Y. 2017-18 was filed on 25.10.2017 declaring total income of Rs.19,86,920/-. The case wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of agreement fixing the value of consideration for transfer of the asset and the date of registration of such transfer of asset are not the same, the stamp value prevailing as on the date of agreement shall be taken. The appellant placing reliance on the decision of Pune Bench in the case of Rahul Construction Vs. DCIT - ITA No.143/PUN/2007 contended that difference in sale consideration and sta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) 2. John Flower (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT - IT Appeal No.7545/Mum/2014, dt. 25.01.2017 3. Karb Associates (P) Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT - IT Appeal No.1941/Kol/2019, dt. 25.08.2021 4. Maria Fernandes Cheryl Vs. ITO (IT) (2021) 123 taxmann.com 252/187 ITD 7387 (Mum.) 5. Sandeep Kumar Poddar Vs. ITO (2023) 151 taxmann.com 18 (Kolkata Trib.) 6. In the extant case under consideration, the differen....