2025 (9) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Tax Case Appeal impugns the order dated 24.04.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the ITAT') "B" Bench, Chennai. 2. The appeal arises under the following circumstances. (a) The assessee/appellant, an individual, filed the return of income on 24.03.2018 for the Assessment Year 2016-17, declaring a total income of Rs. 1,87,050/-. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#39;] rejected the grounds of appeal and upheld the order passed by the Assessing Officer by the order dated 24.03.2023. (f) The ITAT also dismissed the appeal vide the impugned order. 3. The appellant had proposed the following substantial questions of law. "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT erred in disallowing the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in upholding the addition made u/s.68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by treating the sale proceeds of impugned equity shares as unexplained credits, despite the appellant furnishing all necessary evidence to establish the nature and source of the sale transaction? 4. From a perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the ITAT had confirmed the ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant's case. The CIT(A) also found that though sufficient opportunity was given to the assessee/appellant to prove that it was a genuine transaction, the appellant failed to produce any evidence. 6. The only ground raised by the assessee/appellant before us is that since her husband was bedridden, she was unable to produce the evidence before the Assessing Officer. However, we find ....