2025 (9) TMI 35

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, ['Ld. CIT (A)'] is bad, illegal and without jurisdiction, as the same is framed in breach of the statutory provisions and the scheme and as otherwise also is not in accordance with the law. 1.2 Otherwise also, in the facts and the circumstances of the case, and in law, the appellate order so framed by the Ld. CIT (A) is bad, illegal and void as the same is arbitrary and perverse. 2. NATURAL JUSTICE 2.1 The Ld. CIT (A) erred in not granting proper, sufficient and adequate opportunity of being heard to the Appellant while framing the appellate order. 2.2 It is submitted that, in the facts and the circumstances of the case, and in law, the app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....picion and conjecture; (ii) Taking into account irrelevant and extraneous considerations; and (iii) Ignoring relevant material and considerations as submitted by the Appellant. 4.3 It is submitted that in the facts and the circumstances of the case, and in law, no such disallowance was called for. 4.4 Without prejudice to the above, assuming - but not admitting - that some addition was called for, it is submitted that the Ld. CIT (A) failed to appreciate that the computation of the addition made by the A.O. is arbitrary, excessive and not in accordance with the law. 5. LIBERTY The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, delete or modify all or any the above ground at the time of hearing." 2. Rival submissions of both the parties ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by assessing officer. The assessee has shown good gross profit ranging from 3.16% to 7.15% from A.Y. 2008-09 to 2011-12. In 2011-12, the assessee has shown gross profit @ 6.55% in the current financial year. The ld. AR of the assessee submits that entire purchases of the assessee are genuine. The purchases of the assessee cannot be disputed if the seller party defaulted in making payment of VAT. In the alternative submissions, the ld. AR of the assessee submits that to avoid the long drawn process of litigation, some token / adhoc disallowance may be sustained and the assessee may be allowed benefit of gross profit already declared in its books of account. 4. On the other hand, learned Senior Departmental Representative (ld. Sr. DR) for th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....025) * Ajit Anant Joshi vs DCIT (ITA No. 700/M/2025) 6. I have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and have gone through the orders of lower authorities carefully. I have also deliberated on various case laws relied by both the parties. I find that assessing officer made addition on the basis of report of Investigation Wing that certain parties were indulging in providing accommodation entries without actual delivery of goods. The assessing officer made addition of 100% of purchases shown from Sona Engg. Co. and Sona Tools Traders. The assessee has furnished details of purchases and sales thereof. The sales of assesse is not disputed. Books of account of assessee was also not disputed. It is settled position in income ta....