Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (8) TMI 1559

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ability of Rs. 1,25,01,198 under section 73 of Finance Act, 1994, along with interest as applicable under section 75 of Finance Act, 1994, besides imposition of penalty of like amount under section 78 of Finance Act, 1994, is in appeal impugning the proceedings that had been initiated for alleged short-payment of higher magnitude, including Rs. 1,80,57,700 towards rendering of 'port services' that was dropped. The liability saddled on them, comprising Rs. 3,37,100 towards 'technical testing and analysis' service, Rs. 1,20,46,686 towards 'supply of tangible goods service' (vessel) and Rs. 1,17,412 towards the same service in relation to motor launch, MV Shatixa Mini, pertained to April 2010 to September 2012 and had its genesis in EA-2000 au....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hik [2019 (20) GSTL 259 (Tri-Mumbai)]. 4. The decision relied upon by Learned Authorized Representative placed emphasis on the consequence of the impugned amendment on the admitted position that the service, on which tax liability had not been discharged, was 'technical testing and analysis service' and liable to be excluded as having been rendered abroad. Here the appellant had, all along, been insisting that the activity was covered by section 65(105)(zzi) of Finance Act, 1994 and the impugned order rested the finding on conformity of the activity with section 65(105)(zzh) of Finance Act, 1994. The impugned order did subject the activity to scrutiny but the distinguishment between the two has not been adequately appreciated in the impu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994 as held in the adjudication order. The claim of the appellant is not tenable as they do not interface with the persons carried on board. We have no hesitation in affirmation of demand of Rs. 1,17,412, along with interest thereon, and penalty to that extent. 7. On the consideration received from M/s Jag Enterprises for the barges, that clarity is lacking. The appellant is in the business of handling iron ore and transportation of the product in inland waterways is intrinsic to the enterprise just as barges are. According to Learned Counsel, ships are not among the enumerations in section 65 (105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994. While barges are 'self-propelling', they are not just ships but are essenti....