2025 (8) TMI 1613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for M/s. Pass Associates For the Respondent : Dr. B. Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2.The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the respondent and to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed. The system processed the form without any error or objection and issued an acknowledgment, thus validating the deduction at the applicable rate. Subsequently, impugned notice has been issued by the respondent raising a demand for a sum of Rs. 38,76,000/- against the petitioner by treating a valid PAN of the seller as invalid due to non-linkage with Aadhar at the relevant time and consequently ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....06.2025 by way of successful linkage with Aadhaar. Further, it is stated that the Department has issued a circular dated 21.07.2025 in F.No.275/04/2024-IT (B), as per which there is no liability arising under Section 206AA, of the Act and the petitioner is entitled to avail the said benefit. He therefore prays to set aside the impugned notice by considering the applicability of the aforesaid circ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resaid circular. 5. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 6. I find force in the submissions made by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent to the effect that if at all the petitioner intend to find fault on the respondent Department for allowing them to pay 1% TDS, instead of 20%, when the Seller's PAN number was not linked with the Aadhar, the petitioner supposed to ha....