Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Interim stay under Section 7 keeps moratorium intact; lenders must restore withdrawn funds over Rs.143 crore

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The NCLAT held that the interim stay on the admission order under Section 7 did not quash but kept it in abeyance, maintaining the moratorium's nature and proceedings in rem. The application by ARCIL seeking reversal of amounts withdrawn by lenders during the stay was not barred by res judicata, issue estoppel, or merger, as these principles did not apply to the unadjudicated withdrawal issue. On the principle of restitution, lenders who withdrew over Rs.143 crore during the interim period were directed to restore the funds to the corporate debtor's account. The IRP's application to redefine the insolvency commencement date was rightly rejected, as the IRP failed to act in the corporate debtor's interest. The Adjudicating Authority's refusa.........