Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (8) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... I impose a penalty of Rs. 7,08,087/- (Rs. Seven Lakhs Eight Hundred and Eighty Seven, only) upon the assessee under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. However, benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the penalty imposed, as per clause (ii) of second proviso to Section 78(1) ibid, is available to the assessee subject to the condition that the amount of service tax held payable along-with interest so determined is paid within thirty days from the date of communication of this order and further subject to the condition that the benefit of reduced penalty shall be available if the amount of penalty so determined has also been paid within the period of thirty days from the date of communication of the order." 2.1 Appellant is engaged in providing service of construction of complex services. During the course of audit of records of the appellant, it was found that they were collecting interest free maintenance deposit (IFMS) from its customers on which no service tax was paid. 2.2 A Show Cause Notice dated 04.02.2014 was issued to the appellant for the period 01.04.2012 to 30.06.2012 demanding service tax of Rs.1,27,045/-. This Show Cause Notice was adjudicated by order-in-original da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s maintenance deposits for any purposes which is clearly evident from the ledger account of maintenance deposits. 8. I find that the service has defined in clause 44 of the section 65B as:- (44) "Service" means any activity carried out by a person for another for consideration, and includes a declared service, but shall not include- (a) an activity which constitutes merely, -- (i) a transfer of title in goods or immovable property, by way of sale, gift or in any other manner; (ii) a transaction in money or actionable claim; (b) a provision of service by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment; (c) fees taken in any Court or tribunal established under any law for the time being in force. Explanation 1. - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that nothing contained in this clause shall apply to,-- (A) the functions performed by the Members of Parliament, Members of State Legislative, Members of Panchayats, Members of Municipalities and Members of other local authorities who receive any consideration in performing the functions of that office as such member; or (B) the duties performed by any person who holds any pos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xempted many of the services from the levy of service tax vide mega exemption notification 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 amended. 10. It is seen that, in a similar case, the Hon'ble CESTAT in the case of M/s. SOBHA DEVELOPERS LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX. & S.T., LTU, BANGALORE [2017 (51) S.T.R. 319 (Tri. - Bang.)] has held that Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Maintenance or Repair service - Maintenance builder of property, residential complex collecting maintenance deposits for maintenance of property till majority of apartments occupied, formal resident association becomes functional and takes over regular maintenance and repair of complex - Maintenance deposits paid by buyers in terms of agreement for carrying out maintenance of immovable property - Prima facie evident that assessee rendering service under Section 65(64) of Finance Act, 1994 and Service Tax required to be paid - Section 35F of Central Excise Act, applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of Finance Act, 1994 and Section 65(64) of Finance Act, 1994. [para 7] Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Valuation (Service Tax) - Maintenance or repair service - Maintenance property-Quantification of tax due on noti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ls) in appellant's own case for the period wherein as has been held: "7. I observe that the OIO has come to conclusion that the appellant having collected an amount from the prospective flat buyers towards management, maintenance or repair service, tax liability would arise; that the maintenance charges recovered from the prospective purchasers of flat in residential building as well' as commercial building were liable to be taxed as the definition does not make any distinction on the basis whether the service has been rendered to the purchasers or owners of the residential units or commercial units. The,OIO has confirmed the demands raised along with interest and also imposed penalties. 8. I find that the appellants are engaged in providing service of Construction of Complex Service and not in the business of maintenance or repair service, or management of immovable property. The appellants cannot be held as provider of maintenance or repair service as they are not charging anything on their own and amount so received available in their account current liabilities. They act only as trustee or as pure agent. When the co-operative society is formed even the deposit account i....