Remission eligibility includes destroyed inputs under Notification 21/2002 Cus, upholding Rule 21 and Section 23 rights

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The CESTAT upheld the principle that the phrase "for use in manufacture" in notification No. 21/2002 Cus. cannot be interpreted to exclude inputs that are destroyed or not physically incorporated into the final product from remission eligibility. Relying on precedent from a Coordinate Bench, the Tribunal held that such a restrictive interpretation would render Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules and Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 ineffective, which is impermissible. Since no contrary modification or setting aside of the precedent was demonstrated, the impugned order denying remission for alleged violation of end-use conditions was quashed. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.....