Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 1723

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,15,06,093/-. Subsequently, it was found by the importer that the moisture content in the consignment had reduced and actual weight of iron ore fines in terms of DMT has also increased. In view of the increase in the quantity of exported goods, consequent to reduction in moisture content, the buyers paid consideration amounting to USD 6,10,51,076 in respect of such goods. Pursuant to the initiation of investigation proceedings and realizing the bonafide mistake committed by the Appellant, the Appellant discharged differential duty along with applicable interest, The SCN was issued to recover the differential duty along with interest and also proposing to impose penalty. The Adjudicating authority vide Order-in-Original dated 31.03.2016 confirmed the duty demand along with appropriate interest, and duty amount already paid by the Appellant was appropriated. Further, the adjudicating authority imposed equivalent penalty amounting to Rs. 37,99,193/- in terms of Section 114A of the Customs Act. Moreover, the goods were also held to be liable for confiscation under Section 113(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 with an option for redeeming the same against payment of redemption fine amounting ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot be imposed when the assessee duly paid the duty along with interest immediately upon issuance of Show Cause Notice 2.7 In view of the above submissions, it is prayed the appeal may be allowed by setting aside the Order in Original. 3. The Ld. AR appearing for the Revenue submits that the exports have taken place during April 2010 to November 2011. The appellant has realized the higher value from the overseas importer within a few months of exporting the consignments. However, in spite knowing that they are required to pay the differential Export Duty on account of higher realization, the appellant did not pay the same till the issue was investigated and SCN was issued on 15.03.2015. As a matter of fact, they have paid the differential Duty along with interest after issue of the Show Cause Notice. Therefore, he justifies the penalty imposed and confiscation of the goods with option given to redeem the same. 4. We have heard both the sides and have gone through the Appeal papers and the submissions made. 5. Admittedly the issue is not in dispute. The appellant has exported consignments of Iron ore taking their moisture content @ 8% as per the Test Report available at that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y route other than a route specified in a notification issued under clause (c) of section 7 for the export of such goods; (c) any goods brought near the land frontier or the coast of India or near any bay, gulf, creek or tidal river for the purpose of being exported from a place other than a land customs station or a customs port appointed for the loading of such goods; (d) any goods attempted to be exported or brought within the limits of any customs area for the purpose of being exported, contrary to any prohibition imposed by or under this Act or any other law for the time being in force; (e) any goods found concealed in a package which is brought within the limits of a customs area for the purpose of exportation; (f) any goods which are loaded or attempted to be loaded in contravention of the provisions of section 33 or section 34; (g) any goods loaded or attempted to be loaded on any conveyance, or water-borne, or attempted to be water-borne for being loaded on any vessel, the eventual destination of which is a place outside India, without the permission of the proper officer; (h) any goods which are not included or are in excess of those included in the entry made....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order of the proper officer determining such duty, the amount of penalty liable to be paid by such person under this section shall be twenty-five per cent of the penalty so determined; (iii) in the case of any other goods, to a penalty not exceeding the value of the goods, as declared by the exporter or the value as determined under this Act, whichever is the greater. Section 114A. Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases. - Where the duty has not been levied or has been short-levied or the interest has not been charged or paid or has been part paid or the duty or interest has been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, the person who is liable to pay the duty or interest, as the case may be, as determined under sub-section (8) of section 28 shall also be liable to pay a penalty equal to the duty or interest so determined: Provided that where such duty or interest, as the case may be, as determined under sub-section (8) of section 28, and the interest payable thereon under section 28AA, is paid within thirty days from the date of the communication of the order of the proper officer determining....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nment for a term which may extend to 1 [two years],or with fine, or with both. Section 135 . Evasion of duty or prohibitions. - [(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person - (a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods; or (b) acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 111 or Section 113, as the case may be; or (c) attempts to export any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 113; or (d) fraudulently avails of or attempts to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty provided under this Act in connection with 2 [export of goods; or] (e) obtains an instrument from any authority by fraud, collusion, wil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in Raja Impex case (supra), has rendered decision on identical issue. One of the substantial questions of law placed before the High Court by the department was whether redemption fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act could be imposed where the goods were neither available for confiscation nor cleared under bond/undertaking. The Hon'ble High Court followed the ratio of the Apex Court's judgment in Weston Components case and held that, as the goods in question had been allowed to be cleared without execution of any bond/undertaking by the importer, no redemption fine could be imposed under Section 125 of the Customs Act in lieu of confiscation. Reproduced below is the relevant part of the High Court's judgment. "12. It may also be noticed here that in the case of M/s. Weston Components Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi (supra), the goods were released to the assessee on an application made by it and on the execution of a bond by the assessee and in those circumstances, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the merefact that the goods were released on the bond being executed would not take away the power of custom authority to levy redemption fine. A reading of the judgment....