Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

NCLAT Upholds Settlement Using Rs. 50 Crores for Construction Costs, Limits RP's Valuation Authority Under CIRP

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The NCLAT upheld the CoC's resolution authorizing the RP to record the settlement before the NCLT, affirming that the utilization of Rs. 50 crores from commercial shop sales for construction deficits and utilities was appropriate. The Tribunal found no fault with the RP's actions in bringing the settlement on record or with the inclusion of the SRA in the Settlement Agreement, as these were within the CoC's and RP's authority. However, the RP was held to have exceeded authority by obtaining a fresh valuation without CoC or Adjudicating Authority approval, though no dereliction of duty was found. The Tribunal recognized the RP's locus to appeal adverse observations that led to his replacement. Consequently, the adverse findings against the RP in the impugned order were expunged, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.....