Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 1259

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appellant was also engaged in trading activities, which is an exempted service, and therefore the appellants are required to reverse Cenvat credit availed on common input services under Rule 6 (3) of CENVAT Credit Rules as they have not maintained separate accounts/ records; during the course of audit, the appellant reversed an amount of Rs.42,86,832/- for the period 2011-12 and 2012-13 along with interest of Rs.8,83,456/- and penalty of Rs.5,97,151/-; a show cause notice dated 27.02.2014 was issued to the appellants demanding CENVAT credit of Rs.79,99,537/-; learned Commissioner vide impugned order dated 04.03.2015 confirmed the demand along with equal penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules. Hence, this appeal. 2. Learned Cou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....X. & S.T., Lucknow, 2020 (38) G.S.T.L. 57 (Tri. - All.) • Compark E Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. of C. EX. & S.T., Ghaziabad, 2019 (24) G.S.T.L. 634 (Tri. - All.) • Shri Balaji Industrial Products Ltd. vs. Commr. of Cus. & C. Ex., Jaipur, 2019 (370) E.L.T. 280 (Tri. - Del.) 4. Learned Authorized Representative for the Department reiterates the findings of the impugned order and relies on Ruchika Global Interlinks - 2017 (5) GSTL 225 (Mad.). 5. Heard both sides and perused the records of the case. We find that it will be beneficial to have a look at the definition of "Exempted Service" prior to and after 01.04.2011. The definition under Rule 2 (e) of CENVAT Credit Rules is as follows: Befor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is-declaration etc. with intent to evade payment of duty. Therefore, we find merit in the submissions of the appellants that the Revenue has not made out any case for invocation of extended period. It has been held by the Tribunal in a number of cases that in such circumstances, extended period cannot be invoked; moreover, extended period cannot be invoked when the detection was due to an audit conducted. We find that the Principal Bench of the Tribunal in the case of G.D Goenka Private Limited vide Final Order No.51088/2023 dated 21.08.2023 has held as follows: 20. Thus, 'the central excise officer' has an obligation to make his best judgment if either the assessee fails to furnish the return or, having filed the return, fails to ....