Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 1271

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the proposals made in the show cause notice dated 31.08.2022 and confirmed the demand of differential duty of Rs. 21,43,21,579/- along with interest and imposed an equivalent amount as penalty on the appellant under section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 [The Act]. 2. The facts which led to the issue of the impugned order are that the appellant is a subsidiary of M/s Vaptec Company, USA. It imports various parts for use in railways and supplies them to Indian Railways. It classified the goods that were imported under Customs Tariff Item [CTI] 8607 99 90/ 8607 21 00 as parts of railways. The Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence [DRI] initiated investigation into the imports by the appellant and came to the conclusion that 347 items (l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing imposition of penalty under section 114A. 5. The appellant is not contesting the demand or seeking refund of the duty paid or interest. It is only contesting the penalty imposed under section 114A. 6. The classification of the railways parts were under dispute for a long time and in the case of Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs- 2021 (376) ELT 14 (SC) , the Supreme Court held applied the principal/ sole use test and held that relays meant for use in railways are classifiable under Chapter 86. The Review Petition filed by the Revenue against this judgment was also dismissed. Therefore, classification of the disputed goods under Chapter 86 was correct. However, the appellant is not seeking any refund of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ided by us is if SCN should have been issued at all by the DRI or the case should have been closed under section 28(2) of the Act. 13. Section 28(2) as applicable during the relevant period reads as follows: "2) The person who has paid the duty along with interest or amount of interest under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall inform the proper officer of such payment in writing, who, on receipt of such information, shall not serve any notice under clause (a) of that sub-section in respect of the duty or interest so paid or any penalty leviable under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder in respect of such duty or interest: [Provided that where notice under clause (a) of sub-section (1) has been served and the proper ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion as to the truth of the contents of the Bills of Entry. The importer is also required to self-assess duty under section 17 of the Act. There is no separate document or procedure self-assess duty and it is done by filing the Bill of Entry. Assessment is defined under section 2(2) of the Act as follows: "2(2) "assessment" means determination of the dutiability of any goods and the amount of duty, tax, cess or any other sum so payable, if any, under this Act or under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act) or under any other law for the time being in force, with reference to - (a) the tariff classification of such goods as determined in accordance with the provisions of the Customs Tariff Act; ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le it is necessary for an importer to truthfully declare facts in the Bill of Entry, matters of opinion such as the classification cannot be clearly stated as correct or incorrect. All that the appellant can and must do is to declare the CTI under which, according to its understanding, the imported goods fall. This classification can be changed by the officer during re-assessment of the Bill of Entry. If the Bill is Entry is challenged by either side, Commissioner (Appeals) can also modify, the classification. In further appeals, at every stage up to the Supreme Court the classification can be upheld or modified. In other words, the classification of goods by the importer or by the proper officer or by the Commissioner (Appeals) or by this ....