Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 1321

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EP SINGH YERUR For the Petitioner: (By Sri. Ganesh Vishwnath Shandage, Advocate). For the Respondents: (By Sri. Sharad V. Magadum, AGA For R1, R3-R10; Sri. Venkatesh M. Kharvi, Advocate For R2). ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) Petitioner Sangha is a registered taxpayer providing manpower supply services to various Government Departments and Authorities. It is registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'CGST Act') and Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'the KGST Act') with G.S.T. I.N. No.29AAAAH1667D1ZU. 2. Petitioner claims to be an honest, diligent and prompt tax payer under the GST Act and has been timely paying the returns as per law without an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the entire process initiated by them is illegal as coercive methods were used forcing the petitioner to pay the amount, which is recovered by the respondent authorities. It is the contention of petitioner that he has preferred an appeal under Section 107(1) of the GST Act before the appellate authority, which is pending adjudication and the same is not being conducted in an expeditious manner. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the appellate authority to dispose of the matter expeditiously as the petitioner is dependant on the said income which is forceful recovery and he does not have to pay any amount. It is further contended that the petitioner has very good case on merits, the amount i.e....